Skip to main content

Full text of "NOAA technical report NMFS SSRF"

See other formats


SA 
// 
Mo ALU Ss): 
+t 


Fishes 
NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-778 
pee Oy, Bowhead and White Whale 
& Ye %, : : : : ; 
s  * Migration, Distribution, 
mt) Sf and Abundance in the 
“5 


Bering, Chukchi, and 
Beaufort Seas, 1975-78 


Howard W. Braham, Bruce D. Krogman, and 
Geoffrey M. Carroll 


January 1984 


Aan HSON lA v~ 
4 
) 


i 


Ne RARIES 


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
National Marine Fisheries Service 


NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS 


National Marine Fisheries Service, Special Scientific Report—Fisheries 


The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of 
fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the 
resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement 
of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international 
fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance 
and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. 

The Special Scientific Report—Fisheries series was established in 1949. The series carries reports on scientific investigations that document long-term 
continuing programs of NMFS, or intensive scientific reports on studies of restricted scope. The reports may deal with applied fishery pido ans: The series is 
also used as a medium for the publication of bibliographies of a specialized scientific nature. 

NOAA Technical Reports NMFS SSRF are available free in limited numbers to governmental agencies, both Federal and State. They are also available in 
exchange for other scientific and technical publications in the marine sciences. Individual copies may be obtained from D822, User Services Branch, Environ- 
mental Science Information Center, NOAA, Rockville, MD 20852. Recent SSRF’s are: 


722. Gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus, purse seine fishery: Catch, fishing 
activity, and age and size composition, 1964-73. By William R. Nicholson. 
March 1978, iii + 8 p., 1 fig., 12 tables. 


723. Ichthyoplankton composition and plankton volumes from inland coastal 
waters of southeastern Alaska, April-November 1972. By Chester R. Mattson 
and Bruce L. Wing. April 1978, iii + 11 p., 1 fig., 4 tables. 


724. Estimated- average daily instantaneous numbers of recreational and com- 
mercial fishermen and boaters in the St. Andrew Bay system, Florida, and adja- 
cent coastal waters, 1973. By Doyle F. Sutherland. May 1978, iv + 23 p., 31 
figs. 11 tables. 


725. Seasonal bottom-water temperature trends in the Gulf of Maine and on 
Georges Bank, 1963-75. By Clarence W. Davis. May 1978, iv + 17 p., 22 figs., 
5 tables. 


726. The Gulf of Maine temperature structure between Bar Harbor, Maine, and 
Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, June 1975-November 1976. By Robert J. Pawlowski. 
December 1978, iii + 10 p., 14 figs., 1 table. 


727. Expendable bathythermograph observations from the NMFS/MARAD 
Ship of Opportunity Program for 1975. By Steven K. Cook, Barclay P. Collins, 
and Christine S. Carty. January 1979, iv + 93 p., 2 figs., 13 tables, 54 app. figs. 


728. Vertical sections of semimonthly mean temperature on the San Francisco- 
Honolulu route: From expendable bathythermograph observations, June 1966- 
December 1974. By J. F. T. Saur, L. E. Eber, D. R. McLain, and C. E. Dorman. 
January 1979, iii + 35 p., 4 figs., 1 table. 


729. References for the indentification of marine invertebrates on the southern 
Atlantic coast of the United States. By Richard E. Dowds. April 1979, iv + 37 p. 


730. Surface circulation in the northwest Gulf of Mexico as deduced from 
drift bottles. By Robert F. Temple and John A. Martin. May 1979, iii + 13 p., 
8 figs., 4 tables. 


731. Annotated bibliography and subject index on the shortnose sturgeon, Aci- 
penser brevirostrum. By James G. Hoff. April 1979, iii + 16 p. 


732. Assessment of the Northwest Atlantic mackerel, Scomber scombrus, stock. 
By Emory D. Anderson. April 1979, iv + 13 p., 9 figs., 15 tables. 


733. Possible management procedures for increasing production of sockeye 
salmon smolts in the Naknek River system, Bristol Bay, Alaska. By Robert J. 
Ellis and William J. McNeil. April 1979, iii + 9 p., 4 figs., 11 tables. 


734. Escape of king crab, Paralithodes camtschatica, from derelict pots. By 
William L. High and Donald D. Worlund. May 1979, iii + 11 p., 5 figs., 6 
tables. 


735. History of the fishery and summary statistics of the sockeye salmon, On- 
corhynchus nerka, runs to the Chignik Lakes, Alaska, 1888-1956. By Michael 
L. Dahlberg. August 1979, iv + 16 p., 15 figs., 11 tables. 


736. A historical and descriptive account of Pacific coast anadromous salmomid 
rearing facilities and a summary of their releases by region, 1960-76. By Roy 
J. Wahle and Robert Z. Smith. September 1979, iv + 40 p., 15 figs., 25 tables. 


737. Movements of pelagic dolphins (Stenella spp.) in the eastern tropical Pa- 
cific as indicated by results of tagging, with summary of tagging operations, 
1969-76. By W. F. Perrin, W. E. Evans, and D. B. Holts. September 1979, iii 
+ 14p., 9 figs., 8 tables. 


738. Environmental baselines in Long Island Sound, 1972-73. By R. N. Reid, 
A. B. Frame, and A. F. Draxler. December 1979, iv + 31 p., 40. figs., 6 tables. 


739. Bottom-water temperature trends in the Middle Atlantic Bight during spring 
and autumn, 1964-76. By Clarence W. Davis. December 1972, iii + 13 p., 10 
figs., 9 tables. 


740. Food of fifteen northwest Atlantic gadiform fishes. By Richard W. 
Langton and Ray E. Bowman. February 1980, iv + 23 p., 3 figs., 11 tables. 


741. Distribution of gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea) in the Middle At- 
lantic Bight region. By John J. Dickinson, Roland L. Wigley, Richard D. Bro- 
deur, and Susan Brown-Leger. October 1980, iv + 46 p., 26 figs., 52 tables. 


742. Water structure at Ocean Weather Station V, northwestern Pacific Ocean, 
1966-71.. By D. M. Husby and G. R. Seckel. October 1980, 18 figs., 4 tables. 


743. Average density index for walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogamma, in the 
Bering Sea. By Loh-Lee Low and Ikuo Ikeda. November 1980, iii + 11 p., 
3 figs., 9 tables. 


ATMOS, 
pnd ale wa 


<< 


si 
re) 
we 


NOliwesS 


NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-778 


Bowhead and White Whale 
Migration, Distribution, 
and Abundance in the 
Bering, Chukchi, and 
Beaufort Seas, 1975-78 


Howard W. Braham, Bruce D. Krogman, and 
Geoffrey M. Carroll 


January 1984 


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
John V. Byrne, Administrator 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

William G. Gordon, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries 


PREFACE 


This is a final report from Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program (OCSEAP) 
Research Unit 69/70 supported by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and is for the period 
September 1975 to March 1978. Because a great deal of additional research has been conducted since 
1978, as part of an expanded National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) program, we felt it important 
to update our original unpublished final report submitted to OCSEAP in September 1979 in order to 
reflect some new data, clarify past statements, and in general provide more timely information for 
managers. The title of the first edition 1979 report was ‘‘Population biology of the bowhead whale 
(Balaena mysticetus) II: Migration, distribution, and abundance in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort 
Seas, with notes on the distribution and life history of white whales (Delphinapterus leucas).”’ 

This report is not comprehensive because our OCSEAP research was general in scope and the entire 
study area could not be covered completely. Some of the new information added to this report came 
from other programs supported by the NMFS from 1978 to 1981. 

Some of the recommended research we propose in this report, dating back to 1978, have been under- 
taken through BLM. This report, however, does not reflect recent research directly supported by 
them. Again, we do not claim to have covered the breadth and depth of bowhead whale research, and 
recognize that much more work is needed on both species. 


The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend 
or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this 
publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication fur- 
nished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or 


imply that NMFS approves, recommends or endorses any proprietary product 
or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent 
to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased 
because of this NMFS publication. 


CONTENTS 


i Prtirreye Ueto ay ic, RAR Sai Sg EE Re RN CUR des! cAI Sia cen Mat ici a Ean ae OL Mae ob tates 2 A eee same is a J io 
Studyaneatand (datasources paces sec atch eer eser opr teres Syne asec teas eee ds e alfar ee omy saa et ey eat cbc Payay UNC ase te ava) tc ekeyay a ropene eens fo 
STAT To bY EV (ers ape i, LORS ee toe sree atte RURLG, ce Ree eRe in AG ae 9A ene eI eo ee dar ME Reto Ee hie ot 
IDET Semi is-e 0.0. Geet Bene CE EERE 6-6 CR eRe RS Ge ities Ramee naan aie Paar Ey Sian, nr Gate Mat dct clac c ot 
Methodstandlmatertal st sacterryn eee, arora ite serene (Aer Mer hota Mi eats amoMer. APE RE Ith: Ck 1 Ast Rao ee 1 eae eae 
RCekandiland Campsie: es saree eevee ace erste Me coaray Sreyee ver St iro Me aIReD cy cy ope SP tue chs Ren ee VOM ena Ae PORE are A 
JAGHEUIIIRT ees SS ARM e LAR en GH RES imo ib WO etki Heh tt Gandia oi OUMNH nats c caLU RAN Sens nici Acie re ceie eels ciaom 
[ea Or alOny ACUIVAGLES ctr cs cer ce ee Cu eA he tctt eee ema Seen Ste raett ria tet ah ec MRR MLL ett UL ERR ye ore A Re Vee cr 
Review ohibowheadsstocksaec anc cs acicc cuss stich treet eenn Set ad aed PATTY OO ee eon wei Dia aCe DSi tee aE Sa ee a lara 
Spits bergen=Barents}SeaiStOcks ra-tvcitee 7 ach Weer eh es Me eR aloes aoe t oy ray os ee RSV TSI lal tte eWcbaes Gy Mey sop re a Ay 
Wrest Greenland OmbDavis straltisto Gkasmscrrse near ise Ae eo wu tee sd Oi Tenian ee poe en O va bh S Ey yal cen te et ee 
Wiestenn Anctic= Bering SEaStOCKsa a ieccatte eu atve Rca tale ea cst Vie sash Atle aemne atcaae seh RonecceSts oioWade Pacerreysy cut acemsbreRelspey aura ie eee vey 
@MRKHOPSKES CA StO GK see hee ee ee cea aa et NERA 5 CTR ta EA ALICE CARMA Came MDa ATA ANE aly ny Salter! 
Este CereESCATCIRESUL ES usar ene ee secre a resco SEL ge REN MGR Ee Sa raya Gael ORES SCT Fea eel eee Ee OSE ST CT ee ee 
Spring countsiofmisratine/bowheadssiceandilandicampsiemrisetr cui esehloc ere isisps ee hater aetsene eta kegs earn 
BET ARONWy Premiere mics Serre tty Scitech 6 at tste ce ROSTERS cS a Gils cf ce HE ee nesEs ole ETE ENA aU tcl Cer en ESE ee eR ERR ert eR a ges et 
Gapelleisburne=Rointy kyo pews oe ee eee ee ae errs aes aces oR ey OP ETT eT AES Oboe ef yA Pea Se ee re 
Aenial:sunveysioti bowhead:andiwhiteswhalesiiacccncranr citer ncs ster op at tesemen at seatey rae se oinL ee HA ne SeCVE Teed Asati ay haat ewe 
DISCUSSION ANGIE VIE Wire, Lies ce aR ays the be Fann APU reer asp ewe cara ise map enter fied eo Uebel MVP Eat a LOR e Pa PSOE Ee eK. Rn 
WesternyArctic-Bering Seal populationio fsbowheadiwhalesys yeiserin ccreebe store: ctegtcey et seen mee caiey raar s aretig ae el vieue gan eae * 
Distributionsandimigratio nyse sy tesa aS a alice VA oy aaa eE Me es at bra Quek cmtrapaNll A Dont a elena alt is at adial sea fete entacar a ae 
Eifehistoryiandassociatedhin formato secrete eerie Re ore ar aoa red alc oyna ee SOAP AED Pe PR 
REPrOductrOrins < cet cre sne cies enone rasta caL reacted a ane ee rere Bett eg Ae PAN ieee oft REE Ra dL Le TOR UDR eet Ue pee ar 
POST TEV e} (eteiso a crotro Ge cero ae GcaGie 8 GO eo ECOeS Cake Sire eee icra a te eater tet eho HOR onan HE Rina oe Deaton cotter 
Beh avian ese tet se ane Re a ST TL RRP CNR aR ar BA RS MRA AN | ee 
Mccurrence\o fibowheadsiniouter continentalishelfileaserareasts tem Mie tacey tse este setav ae sige) clcetaies einleeda ties Sece\ fg he eed cara 
@uterBristol/Bay-StGeorgeiBasiny eons wc cicce ee ee yates aston Aes wpa acu cy Syanetons Care cusee EY beth sitter ey Sie ce ee ae 
INaVanin’ Basins yes coercive cesses en tee mil cance Cou eC en A EURATE ARE, GoM LC I ER AI arta aR ME ORS LELAND, eae Able fears 
INortoniSound-northenniBering:Seaisca cos rve ms os sete See ie eae cU Ayo are eter ae er ear a fd cis check atop 
HopelBasinyand northeastenm(GhukcChitSeavy sein ne screen ic lash cesta ee ee reteta este inert pete ieea aa eae 
Beaton Seatac: ric sat aes terse cyalstapteysteg so ey ties URIS ee aiceees Es geysers IM dee ag Rts UL SUA roa gaye as re 
Eastcofilongitude'l50 Wi... Gaia fz ne eee ara coy otk eters id es] een eg a eR CTO oe a ae 
Wrest: ofilongitud en] SOW spss. 3 ovens spa cecttcvare! facie craters MEA cep sve MNO a tty gle Cae rend JA lM RL eal eon i ee 
Axquestion of species:identity: bowheadjingurukaneht whaler veces ets actress pei neeaten hc teak heir eased pean eee ae 
ELISCORICATIEVIGEN CE! sie se teee eh Re Steet TS ee Ne eee SEA esi UGE Pate ea Lect do CUA he ik URS 
INomenclaturer ns scalars a wen ete enema tes Tu rn RE Ca hele are <A ROMER REI aE UU eyo SE Ian Ur UA DRS SR Praca 
Geosraphic isolations. o-y.:c ire see ereke cee ae eee nea PEE aE nL EN aru ey ence en ea oe ac aaa eae PES ge ect ON 
Biglogicalievid ence ite a so cxecpc Se eceeie et eee asctee ret ee ease oa te Ee nies Real NSE ND A) ee ded 
Morphologicalhfeanu res say c.se reese irgcs seco eee eae ES aT ee ane ee ene ToT TR Lea ie SL A La are 
SExiaNnGlSiZe;CateONIZAOM eras alee ee NT sal heig en Le ps ea et OPP eee ge PEA pee ma 
Genetic-biochemicalistudies yates ch) mines eases cca tes aT aS PPA MN Real CAH Gee los aie dee AL ie 
(Clot Ve IS (0) eee Res eR erp et eae lara OnE Oh RAAT Gaye. AANA TUEMOR Cn TMAEMLS SLi Re Reem eer Al oe 
Wihiteswhales invA askale cer ccyeteccr eres cpar terra iene ene ost ne eo IS eC EHNA IE St aM ay tra SESE ALA Mat aa cA 
ASDUNGANCE/AN GiGISELI DUCTION se ceraye se encteg cessor exc vote che eh eer Ss Sais RTL SCTE ey I ly el ce Ses ree ae eta fe ara Se 
I BTS (AVY a reese pens Ole cee HCE Aceh Sie Foca OTIS EC te Cone Teeter tae aataT tas erga tenn meat sy cee see bi di 
WenititiysOL{StOCKS) crc. cu: zie a eet ic ae ee ee one A ue coer Soe REE OL ULB Ae ir Meu sae) AT Leni ALI pap 
Kifeshistonyjandiassociatediinformationy ce ae cei .rras sera see ee eee Te ene Cea eee 
IREPTO GAUCHO epee perce eres eee hee CIS ere ere OTR TT 2 ar PRTC) anal CPA ULE (ale nar Con ees 
OOGINADIES seven eras ne AVete oe uate cetceepen eet atic ea eta e ea Weichaa ea oe ea etn syle nue ey ate eye Pa a a a 
GLOUPICOMPOSICIOM ty sterstae essere Oe tele ree ene eA SAT Sa ar ene Me NAS eee oc Un treD baeeeeaN 
Recommendation Sprraccra ty ae sate Retin ison Lene err oe coy ea Ta ale NONLUO aTess sic SN CAPR ey ORD yao Ue LE 
ATES WER C NOCH) aon olor Ge pou oPSis H Abo Rea Ube Gaon 6H bio Sr oe nbd Hat cone Ue anigakecd omonoeneE 
Proposediresearch need Siyeciy. treme rar reictseeereeiee teres eee te a tare sedi ahe tn ar MAR Ov aR ardcte a ver eA 
BETIS SCAmA pee en RPV eye crn GN era err on Lanny Aue y epte oi AAR AS Nore nt ae a SR TREND De a 
Chukchi Sea 


| ESPNU LO) Aa SSLSPEV acres wars hcl Pen ENG teh, ete en ma ahaa) MARL lc ele Ween i ead WL Lay UALR 
Non-site specific studies 
Acknowledgments 
MSIF ETACUITE CIE SCL Pry. bres Aeris Neem me Nee IMU ES UNE PAUL FILES 1 Pl MEVERORL I cURL Ay serrlt al LALO APM ce Ge Dec opeL a eae a fac Mat 
MTSPSCTUGEXAL orate nese Peystisy se tet eres ee eMart se Parriey oa espn SEDANS Te CTS dota aE eRe ere ate MESON ce Acs) SERIS oe Ry ek 
Appendix II 


ili 


CCH ODWWWHWWWNNNN — — — 


\o 


WN 


Figures 


Approximate world distribution of bowhead whales prior to commercial exploitation .....................2....00. 4 
Locations where bowhead whales were harvested by Yankee whalers ........... 02.000 eeeececececece ete ssenuns 5-7 
Comparison among years of estimated total number of bowhead whales migrating northwardly past Pt. Barrow, 
AlaskattromvllorA prilitoySOUM AY, < ccc. cce.- «.ekelere:cieceresessioveros > die ce, sr esayateral spevetorsyeve 4 alejaue a Dole] et TRE nS ee 8 
Comparison among years of observer effort expended from 15 April to 30 May ................. 2.0.00 eee eee eee 9 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the northern Bering Sea, March 1976..................... 9 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the Bering Sea, April 1976 ... 0... 0... ese eee eee ees 10 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the Bering Sea, April 1976................. 0000 e eee e ees 10 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, March-April 
NOT S65 ons bic 0b DEOL OR DIO OO Ree to a a ae eee een ee ne MPS a cs dno dagio cece 0.0 0100 00.06 11 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, March-April 
MOTT oy bao kod Goole ees an Hit ee EPL ee es Oe a Per aE RCP rime odiaen tte His ao ob.oooccoc 11 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and southern Beaufort Seas, April and May 
NOG sa. c-cou chan oa A i0 to OAS SEG eee eae ea a ee ne RS AR eI erica sb ah aoe biSUEw OCD Oo00s 11 
. Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, May 1976..... 1] 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, April-May 1976 .... 12 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, May 1977 .. 12 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Bering and southeastern Chukchi Seas, May 
Oi ee reese et aha teh aie seilh glove us Geavaudyentcear au e-Uyo) dug sl soos dincy ahebecd a: asta} aulelepniey othe HORSES ALG EERE NCO EI Cee 12 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the western Beaufort Sea, May 1977 ..................25. 13 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, early June 
TEL ORR Pe Pesaro bo sete esto crc oeche ake 15) 8 dekh oe ane WEES Beg ata © ai wad abs be kat Se cateanse CLEA Soe eERSTEE Ve ater cee 13 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, June 1976.... 13 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, mid-June 
DIT Gp eeee cet N ce seal creche ees ateils SS barcnalls sosabeee ois analdicdoe vetahaly atbusiet hs apetes edsequase apts amd. gpaltatinua ce toupee pee nc RC RR GE (AGE oo AN eg 14 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, early June 
NID i7 Geter nyse terre sence tscanc cou aves hb dena Ab wpe eu dey #1 sgarsdadelegua canag lane, lg arson: oebeed acahaneuty are ahd dete ICT ee 14 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, June 
N77 Oar eet ets cakiesshe cts. svete apshahe na thieia, coe Ghd she ona, dha oua.ts Has gutta aehal apallayel a, Soo stee RAPE Ee Sh 14 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, mid-June 
WG Geer erect h rect clans lial Ses, alis so bsacehe tediot' pevin den spapah'vias ee edluny oes ld tapas ada teltoyretell wausten ade aes SOME es Ua 14 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the northern Bering, eastern Chukchi, and western Beaufort 
SeastyAUs usta Gha es aie scgcsnscdase. ay peice gee ecaiten alle wees ite, hav ayace, Bear oe Ra) a. pip eee SUE ae Ec Seo Se 15 
. Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the northern Bering, eastern Chukchi, and western Beaufort 
SCASMATIOUS HMO Oy tees ca Sie, scat sce cy sag coe coh Wid dSSranstp Gok gn si Guspe asiisl avas"ual eraneiete ayens coperey siG) oe geet eaRe P YSUEOT eR OLS erea ae 15 
Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, September 
NAO eee becsosisyepect esis ne rele yelas sccythatantce itvcastacel avdsabaagSCSSHE bas MoM ules ales do Sictepeeay age neds-o eke eae i ngetle cog ge a ea ae rr 15 
. Aerial survey tracklines and bowhead observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, August- 
(Oye vce Indie COM Ooh eee ae eee A ree omen esr hi ood Ga oueob od od ouelod saac0¢ 16 
Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, September 
IDG aece saa Meee Ota en a nee Meier CGE Tens oi Bec gadebooces ococe 16 
. Aerial survey tracklines and white whale observations in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas, August- 
October Miiimeen wre ceed fev att crepe tiemeanebanenttte orci doueks sea, tuneacisrasibwaracepss badutrene ste le HOR Haste aR ceed es CLEP ee 16 
. Aerial survey tracklines in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, October 1975................000-00005 16 
Bowhead whale sightings in the Bering and southern Chukchi Seas, 1974-79, from aerial and vessel surveys.......... 17 
Bowhead whale sightings in the Beaufort Sea, August through November 1974-78 ........---. 00000 eeeeeeeeeeeeee 19 
aeAchialisunvey tracklines flown by NMFS scientists; September 1974 «0/22 .\c. se an ese ees eee eee 20 
. Sightings of white whales during aerial surveys conducted between the months of March and September 1975-77 ..... Dy 
Tables 


. Summary of spring counts of bowhead whales during their annual spring migration through the flaw zone near Bar- 


ONg ANE al) os LGN Sine Isa i a an re re Ere MA aT oY Lecdeh o.dos:o GocoS 600000 


Summary of some estimated reproductive life history data for bowhead whales ...............2.0.. 000022 ee eeee 21 
. Area use and timetable for the majority of the bowhead whale population in or adjacent to proposed Outer Continen- 
tallShelifileaserareasiofithe Bering} Chukchi; andiBeaufort Seas) .. 1... 4. . joeeee eee eee Eee oe eee 24 
Sightings of bowhead whales within and adjacent to the existing Beaufort Sea Outer Continental Shelf lease area be- 
nhwecnlonemlsOsandyl45iowawithinithe2imidepthicontounc.. .seesccee ene eee ee een Eeeer ene 25 


Bowhead and White Whale Migration, Distribution, and 


Abundance in the Bering, Chukchi, and 
Beaufort Seas, 1975-78 


HOWARD W. BRAHAM, BRUCE D. KROGMAN, and GEOFFREY M. CARROLL! 


ABSTRACT 


From September 1975 to September 1977 we conducted field research on bowhead, Balaena mysticetus, and 
white, Delphinapterus leucas, whales in the U.S. Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. The objectives were to de- 
termine the general distribution and migration of these whales in spring and autumn and to estimate abundance. 
We also surveyed the literature beginning in June 1975 through March 1978 to augment our empirical results. 

Bowhead and white whales spend the winter months among the pack ice and open water of the central and 
western Bering Sea. They migrate into the eastern Chukchi Sea and across the southern and central Beaufort Sea 
from April through June. Their route takes them along the west side of the northern Bering Sea through Bering 
Strait, along the northwest coast of Alaska between Point Hope to Point Barrow, generally within 50 km of shore 
(closer to Point Barrow than off Point Hope and Cape Lisburne), and offshore in the Beaufort Sea generally to 
within 60 km of the coast. Exceptions exist, and these are pointed out in the text. 

It appears that virtually the entire bowhead migration follows this pattern; however, white whales may be 
divided into groups (or stocks) of varying sizes, some occurring in Bristol Bay, Norton Sound, Kotzebue Sound, 
and along the northwest coast of Alaska during summer. The largest component of the white whale population 
migrates into the Canadian Beaufort Sea in spring at roughly the same time as the bowheads. Autumn migration 
results were not obtained, generally, for either species. 

The 1978 minimum estimate of the size of the bowhead population was 1,800 to 2,900 individuals, and for 


the white whales occurring in Alaskan waters between 9,000 and 16,000 individuals. 


INTRODUCTION 


In 1975 the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assess- 
ment Program (OCSEAP) Office awarded a contract to the 
Marine Mammal Division (now the National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory) of the Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center, 
NMEFS, to study the bowhead whale, Ba/aena mysticetus, and 
white whale, Delphinapterus leucas, in the Bering, Chukchi, 
and Beaufort Seas. The objectives were to summarize the 
current state of knowledge on each population, define migra- 
tion routes and timing, and make an estimate of population 
size from original field research and a review of the literature. 
Field research was funded from September 1975 to September 
1977. 

This report is the final of two reports written under OCSEAP 
contract number R7120807, research unit 69/70. Braham and 
Krogman (1977)? covered our first full year’s research, 1976. 
All significant research findings, including those already re- 
ported on in our other OCSEAP reports, are incorporated 
into this report. This document is an update of the final re- 
port submitted to OCSEAP in September 1979. 

During the course of our field research, information was 
acquired on spring movements of whales from St. Lawrence 
Island to Point Barrow. Research on bowhead and white 
whale distribution south of St. Lawrence Island was not ex- 


National Marine Mammal Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, 
NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 


*Braham, H. W., and B. D. Krogman. 1977. Population biology of the bow- 
head (Balaena mysticetus) and beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) whales in the 
Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. Processed rep., 29 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal 
Lab., Northwest and Alaska Fish. Cent., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 
Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 


tensive, nor was much information found in the literature. 
Also, our understanding of distribution in the Beaufort Sea 
was fragmentary, coming from scant data from our research, 
from Eskimo informants, and from early commercial whaling 
accounts. At the time this contract was active, specific oil 
lease sites were not known. Therefore, our research was 
directed only at a general understanding of these species. 

In 1978, the National Marine Fisheries Service expanded its 
research on bowhead whales, with the principal objectives of 
determining population size and obtaining information on 
life history parameters. Data acquired during the 1978 and 
1979 field seasons are reported in Braham et al. (1979, 1980c, 
d, e). Further analyses, and reports, are continuing. Where 
applicable, information from these papers is presented here. 

The bowhead whale is the most depleted marine mammal 
occurring in Arctic and sub-Arctic waters of the Northern 
Hemisphere. Under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, no 
human activities of any kind can take place which are likely 
to jeopardize the continuing existence of a species or popula- 
tion. Proposed OCS development for oil and gas in the Beau- 
fort, Chukchi, and Bering Seas includes habitat essential for 
the survival of this population. 

Results presented in this report represent the first research 
funded by a U.S. Federal agency to provide baseline infor- 
mation on the endangered bowhead whale in relation to pro- 
posed OCS development. 


STUDY AREA AND DATA SOURCES 
Study Area 


The study area included the eastern Bering Sea, the Chuk- 
chi Sea east of the USA-USSR 1867 Convention Line, and 


the Beaufort Sea to the United States-Canadian border at 
long. 141°W. 

Sea ice covering the Chukchi Sea begins to advance south 
in early October from its most northerly limit near lat. 72°- 
74°N and extends well into the Bering Sea through June dur- 
ing average ice years (Shapiro and Burns 1975). Sea ice is 
present winter and spring over most of the intercontinental 
shelf of the northern and eastern Bering Sea and occurs in- 
frequently in the southwestern Bering Sea. With the progres- 
sion of winter, landfast ice develops most extensively in bays 
and inlets that are protected from the shearing forces of 
mobile drift (sea) ice. Landfast ice increases outward from 
shore to the 12-30 m depth contour. Along the northwest 
coast of Alaska from Point Hope to Point Barrow in spring, 
a persistent flaw or transition zone occurs between the land- 
fast ice and pack ice where open water often is found. These 
Open water pathways are called leads when they are long and 
thin; when the openings are persistent and lake-like, they are 
called polynyas. The importance of polynyas has recently 
been summarized by Stirling (1980). It is this transition zone 
which is used by migrating bowhead and white whales. The 
transition zone may exceed 50 km in width near Cape Lis- 
burne and Point Hope during some years (pers. obs.; Burns 
et al. 1977°); east of Point Barrow into the Beaufort Sea the 
zone occurs farther offshore (Marko 1975). 

Shelf waters of the Beaufort Sea are typically ice-free from 
late July to September or early October, but northernly winds 
may keep or blow the pack ice near or against the coastline 
at any time (Blood 1977*). 


Data Sources 


Aerial surveys were used to study the spatial distribution 
of bowhead and white whales throughout the Bering, Chuk- 
chi, and Beaufort Seas. Data collected during these surveys 
have been digitized, stored in the National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory computer file library (Appendix I), and submitted 
to the Environmental Data Service (EDS), NOAA. 

Spring migration and temporal distribution of bowhead 
and white whales along the northwest coast of Alaska were 
studied from ice and land stations near Point Barrow, Cape 
Lisburne, and Point Hope. Since data collected at these field 
sites during 1976 and 1977 were analyzed by hand (not digi- 
tized for computer analysis), they were not submitted to EDS. 


METHODS AND MATERIALS 
Ice and Land Camps 


During the spring migration, counts of bowhead and white 
whales were maintained on a 24-h basis as conditions allowed 
at the following localities: Fast ice edge near Point Barrow 
(25 April-2 June 1976 and 19 April-3 June 1977); cliffs at 


‘Burns, J. J., L. H. Shapiro, and F. H. Fay. 1977. The relationships of marine 
mammal distributions, densities, and activities to sea ice conditions. Jn Environ- 
mental assessment of the Alaskan continental shelf, annual reports of principal 
investigators for the year ending March 1977, Vol. 1, Receptors mammals. 
Unpubl. rep., p. 503-554. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Oceanic Atmos. Admin., 
Environ. Res. Lab., Boulder, Colo. 

“Blood, D. A. 1977. Birds and marine mammals: the Beaufort Sea and the 
search for oil. Unpubl. rep., 12 p. Beaufort Sea Project, Dep. Fish. Environ., 
Can. 


Cape Lisburne (6-15 May 1977); and fast-ice edge off Point 
Hope (18 April-28 May 1977). One or two observers stood 
4-h watches. 

As whales moved past observers, the following informa- 
tion was scored: Number of animals; direction of travel; 
general behavior; weather conditions; time of day; and, when 
possible, length of time animal(s) spent at the surface and 
duration of dive. 

In 1978, an upgraded counting effort was conducted at 
Point Barrow, Alaska, using two counting stations (Braham 
et al. 1979). The camps, called South Camp and North Camp, 
worked with each other, 15 April-5 June. South Camp ob- 
servers made the primary counts and, through radio com- 
munication to North Camp, North Camp observers evaluated 
South Camp’s results. The watch schedule during 1978 was 
two observers per shift rotating each 3 h. Documentation of 
current ice camp counting procedures and theory is reported 
in Krogman et al. (1979)’ and Krogman (1980). In addition 
to the Barrow counts, counting was conducted at Cape Lis- 
burne 2 April-7 June 1978. 


Aerial Survey 


Aerial survey procedures were designed to delineate near- 
shore and offshore distribution of whales, frequently over 
pack ice conditions. We flew the aircraft over open water— 
the leads or polynya—at elevations of 70-300 m depending 
upon cloud cover. Data collected on bowheads and white 
whales during OCSEAP studies RU 14 (Krogman et al. 1979°) 
and RU 67 (Braham et al.’) are included in this report. Aerial 
survey methodology for RU’s 14 and 67 differed in the place- 
ment of flight tracks in that for those studies (walruses and 
seals) tracks were flown as straight lines irrespective of sea ice 
coverage. Because this report presents aerial survey results by 
showing only tracklines and geographic positions of sightings, 
the two methodologies of aerial survey (systematic flying 
Over Open water versus straight tracklines) are analytically 
equivalent although no estimate of abundance is generated 
from either method. Aerial surveys were not flown to make 
estimates of bowhead abundance. This method was deter- 
mined to be impractical (experimentally) and too costly. 

Four aircraft types were used during the surveys for whale 
distribution: A single engine Cessna from Cape Smythe Air 
Service, Barrow, Alaska; a twin-engine Grumman Otter char- 
tered from the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory, Barrow, 
or Cape Smythe Air Service; a twin-engine Grumman Goose 
and a Lockheed P-2V both chartered from the Office of Air- 
craft Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, 
Alaska. Depending on the aircraft used, one to five observers 


‘Krogman, B. D., R. M. Sonntag, H. W. Braham, S. Savage, and G. W. 
Priebe. 1979. Arctic Whale Task ice camp survey format 1979 version. Unpubl. 
manuscr., 60 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 
Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 

*Krogman, B. D., H. W. Braham, R. M. Sonntag, and R. G. Punsly. 1979. 
Early spring distribution, density and abundance of the Pacific walrus (Odo- 
benus rosmarus) in 1976. Unpubl. rep., 47 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. 
Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 
98115. 

"Braham, H. W., R. D. Everitt, B. D. Krogman, D. J. Rugh, and D. E. With- 
row. 1977. Marine mammals of the Bering Sea: Preliminary analysis of distribu- 
tion and abundance, 1975-76. Processed rep., 90 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., 
Northwest and Alaska Fish. Cent., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand 
Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 


were used; the usual crew of two observers, one recorder, 
and one person resting aft rotated hourly to reduce observer 
fatigue. For the study period 1976-78, the Grumman Goose 
was by far the more frequently used aircraft. 

Information recorded included species identification; num- 
ber of adults and/or calves; local time of sightings; geo- 
graphic position to 1 square nmi obtained from an onboard 
Global Navigation System-500; perpendicular angular dis- 
tance from aircraft to animal(s) taken with an optical read- 
ing clinometer (Model PM-5/360 PC, by Suunto Oy of Fin- 
land); animal activity; and environmental data on weather, 
visibility, and ice. Complete documentation of aerial survey 
methodology used for this research is reported in Krogman 
et al. (1979)°. 


Laboratory Activities 


Ice and land camp results are presented by locality by year. 
Length of season, total number of hours watched, percent of 
total hours watched, total number of whales counted, and 
indices to total number of whales passing by the counting 
camps are presented. Bowhead abundance indices for spring 
seasons 1976 and 1977 were computed as the sum of the 
products of rates per day for each day times 24 h. Histo- 
grams showing the daily index are used to illustrate temporal 
distribution that-occurred during each field study. Indices are 
presented for bowheads only. The temporal distribution of 
white whales was too clumped to calculate a meaningful 
index. 

Aerial survey results are presented in computer plots show- 
ing effort and sighting data. Numerical results accompanying 
the figures include the total number of adults and immatures 
observed, average group size, and standard deviation (SD) of 
average group size. A plot of all tracklines flown in 1976 and 
1977 is displayed in Appendix II. 


REVIEW OF BOWHEAD STOCKS 


Rice (1977) recognized four bowhead whale populations or 
stocks worldwide: 1) From Spitsbergen west to east Green- 
land, called the Spitsbergen stock by Tomilin (1957) or Spits- 
bergen-Barents Sea stock by Jonsgard’; 2) in Hudson Bay, 
Davis Strait, Baffin Bay, and James Bay, called the West 
Greenland stock by Tomilin (1957) or Davis Strait stock by 
the International Whaling Commission (IWC) Committee of 
Scientific Advisors (IWC 1978); 3) Bering, Chukchi, and 
Beaufort Seas, called the Bering-Chukchi stock by Tomilin 
(1957), Bering Sea stock by the IWC (1978), or the western 
Arctic population by Durham (1972)'° and Bockstoce (1977); 
and 4) in the Sea of Okhotsk. Mitchell (1975) recognized five 
stocks, treating a Hudson Bay stock as isolated from the 
West Greenland stock. Figure 1 is an overview of the species 
distribution prior to commercial exploitation. 


*Krogman, B. D., R. M. Sonntag, and H. W. Braham. 1979. Arctic Whale 
Task aerial survey format 1979 version. Unpubl. manuscr., 30 p. Natl. Mar. 
Mammal Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 
32, Seattle, WA 98115. 

A. Jonsgard, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, pers. commun. 7 February 
1979. 

'°Durham, F. E. 1972. Biology of the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus L.) 
in the western Arctic. Unpubl. manuscr., 93 p. Univ. Southern Calif., Dep. 
Biol., Los Angeles, CA 90500. 


Commercial whaling severly reduced the Spitsbergen stock 
during the 17th century, the West Greenland stock during the 
18th century, and the western Arctic-Bering Sea and Okhotsk 
Sea stocks during the 19th century (Tomilin 1957; Braham 
and Krogman footnote 2; Bockstoce 1978''). 


Spitsbergen-Barents Sea Stock 


Bowheads from this stock apparently wintered south of the 
area bounded by the eastern coast of Greenland, Iceland, 
and Jan Mayen Island, to Spitsbergen (Tomilin 1957). Their 
northeasterly spring movement was associated with the reces- 
sion of the ice front, with some whales arriving at Spitsber- 
gen in April (Clark 1943). By early summer, most of the 
population was found between Greenland, Spitsbergen, and 
the Barents Sea, with some animals occurring south along the 
coast of Greenland when sea ice coverage was extensive (Vibe 
1967). A southerly migration was made during autumn along 
the Greenland coast and open winter areas of the coast. 
From an initial population estimated at 25,000 (IWC 1978), 
the Spitsbergen-Barents Sea stock underwent a gross reduc- 
tion in size as a result of intensive commercial whaling (Vibe 
1967). This stock 1s now considered to be nearing extinction 
(Jonsgard 1981, footnote 9). Reeves (1980) recently com- 
pleted a review of the stock. 


West Greenland or Davis Strait Stock 


Recent information on the seasonal distribution of bow- 
heads in this stock is lacking. However they apparently winter 
in southern Davis Strait from Godhaven southwest to approx- 
imately lat. 60°00'N. Migration to summering grounds is 
closely associated with the northerly retreat of the ice front. 
The summering area and migration routes include northeast 
Baffin Bay as far north as Smith Sound (Clark 1943), the 
waters between the islands of the Canadian Arctic Islands 
and as far west as Barrow Strait (Gilmore 1951), Lancaster 
Sound, and Prince Regent Inlet (Lubbock 1937). Animals 
apparently winter also in Hudson Strait and southcentral and 
western Hudson Bay. In summer, animals move to the north- 
western part of Hudson Bay and Foxe Basin (Gilmore 1951; 
Ross 1974). Sex and age segregation within the population 
was reported by Southwell (1898) to be that older males 
occurred more often in open water than females and young 
who were associated with the pack ice front. The initial stock 
size was estimated at 6,000 and the current level is believed to 
be 10% of that (IWC 1978). However, since so few animals 
have been seen in this century, it seems likely that the present 
population size is smaller than the 10% estimated.'? Mans- 
field (1971) believed the stock was recovering; recent studies 
have not confirmed this (Davis and Koski 1980). 


Western Arctic-Bering Sea Stock 


The distribution of bowheads in the western Arctic-Bering 
Sea stock prior to commercial exploitation (1848) can be in- 


"'Bockstoce, J. R. 1978. A preliminary estimate of the reduction of the west- 
ern Arctic bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) population by the pelagic whal- 
ing industry: 1848-1915. Unpubl. rep., 33 p. U.S. Mar. Mammal Comm., 1625 | 
St. N.W., Wash., DC 20006. 

"R. Davis, LGL Ltd., Toronto, Can., pers. commun. 30 June 1979. 


“uoreylojdxa [eissauIW09 0) JoLNd sajeyM pkayMog Jo UONNGUISIP pom ayeunxosddy —"T aun 


oO 


of es Y) 
VoI¥aWY HLYON 


-- F wal 44 se1uey> 4 


¥. 


NoO9 


Spunulyy 
" 
7 fa 
Y yp 
nC 4 Te 
b, YP SUIT puns a rN) 


Torveaisreonl 
tt ua 
Cs mS 
RS 


Wida8IS 


ONVIN339H9 


400S 4.0¢£ oO MoO M.O9 M.oO6 MoO M.OS1 o08l J.00S! 4.0¢l 


ferred from Townsend’s (1935) charts which locate by month 
bowhead whales taken by Yankee whalers (Fig. 2). The whal- 
ing grounds were within lat. 53° to 73°N and long. 120°W to 
175°E. Whaling occurred in the Bering Sea from April to 
July and, in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, generally from 
August to October. The lack of harvest records north of the 
Bering Strait during April and May is explained by the avoid- 
ance of heavy ice by whalers. Very few whales were taken in 
the eastern Bering Sea, suggesting that the species was for- 
merly distributed off the continental shelf in the southwest 
Bering Sea and over the shelf in the west central and northern 
Bering Sea during the winter, spring, and early summer 
months. 


Wrangel |. 
CD, 


SIBERIA 


° 


> 


Lawrence I. 


Bering Sea 


xe spara- 


Initial stock size estimates range from 9,000 to 40,000 
(IWC 1978; Bockstoce and Botkin 1980'*), with a best esti- 
mate of about 18-20,000 (IWC 1978; Breiwick et al. 1980; 
Bockstoce footnote 11). The stock was exploited commercially 
from 1848 to approximately 1921. An estimate of the popula- 
tion size in the early 1900’s is 600-2,000 (Eberhardt and 
Breiwick 1980). For further details of commercial exploitation 


'Bockstoce, J. R., and D. B. Botkin. 1980. The historical status and reduc- 
tion of the western arctic bowhead whale (Ba/aena mysticetus) population by the 
pelagic whaling industry, 1848-1914. Unpubl. rep., 120 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal 
Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, 
Seattle, WA 98115. 


ARCTIC OCEAN A 


Beaufort Sea 


Chukchi Sea ‘y 
nC 
xy Oe 
& ALASKA 
CANADA 
=A 
NING 
NS 
Gulf of aN 


Alaska 


Figure 2.—Locations where bowhead whales were harvested by Yankee whalers in A,B) April and May 1848-1919; C,D) June and July 
1848-1919; and E-G) August, September, and October 1849-1919. Each black dot represents a single harvested whale. Data redrafted by 


month from Townsend (1935). 


and whaling activities refer to Marquette (1976, 1977'*), 
Bockstoce (footnote 11), and Marquette and Bockstoce (1980). 


Okhotsk Sea Stock 


Bowheads were generally found in the northern and western 
Okhotsk Sea in spring and summer. They once occurred as 
far north as Penzhinskaya Inlet and as far west as Tchantar 
Bay (Townsend 1935). During spring, they were also taken as 
far south as Korea and Japan (Townsend 1935; Nishiwaki 
and Kasuya 1970). Today, their seasonal movements are un- 


‘Marquette, W. 1977. The 1976 catch of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) 
by Alaskan Eskimos, with a review of the fishery, 1973 - 1976, and a biological 
summary of the species. Processed rep., 80 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., North- 
west and Alaska Fish. Cent., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point 
Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 


known. During the late 1850’s, as it became more difficult to 
find bowheads in the Bering Sea, whalers turned their atten- 
tion to the Okhotsk Sea, and soon depleted this stock. Initial 
stock size has been estimated at 6,500 (IWC 1978). Although 
inconclusive, recent results of Bockstoce and Botkin (foot- 
note 13) leads us to conclude that intermixing between the 
Okhotsk Sea and the Bering Sea stocks may have taken place 
in the past, but probably not since the late 19th century. 
Sighting records supplied by A. A. Berzin'* indicate that 
bowheads still occur in the Okhotsk Sea: 16 bowheads were 
sighted during surveys in 1973-74. Fifty-five bowheads were 
seen in the south-southwest Okhotsk Sea during an August 
aerial survey in 1979 (Berzin and Doroshenko 1981). 


*A. A, Berzin, Pacific Scientific Research Institute of Fisheries Oceanography 
(TINRO), 20 Lenin St., Vladivostok, U.S.S.R., pers. commun. 7 January 1976. 


Figure 2.—Continued. 


“+ SEPTEMBER 
{> 
2 


“~ OCTOBER 
F 


Figure 2.—Continued. 


FIELD RESEARCH RESULTS 


Spring Counts of Migrating Bowhead Whales: 
Ice and Land Camps 


Barrow 


Counts of bowhead whales were made 25 April-2 June 1976, 
19 April-3 June 1977, and 15 April-S June 1978 at the near- 
shore lead northwest of Point Barrow. These periods coincided 
with the annual northeasterly spring migration of bowhead 
whales from their winter grounds in the Bering Sea to summer 
feeding grounds in the Arctic Ocean. Summary data for these 
three census years are presented in Table 1. The estimate of the 
number of whales passing the camps during the census periods 
was not, for 1976 to 1978, considered to be a total population 
estimate. A more detailed comparison of indices among years 
for the period 15 April-30 May is reported in Braham et al. 
(1979, 1980c) and Krogman (1980). 


Table 1.—Summary of spring counts of bowhead whales during their annual 
spring migration through the flaw zone near Barrow, Alaska. Indices of abund- 
ance (‘‘Index’’) were computed as the sums of the products of daily rates times 
24h (see Krogman 1980 and Fig. 3). 


Total Total Percent 
Counting hoursin hours period Bowheads 
Year period period watched watched counted Index 
1976 =. 25 Apr.-2 June 936 392:25 42 330 762 
1977. 19 Apr.-3 June 1,104 395:12 36 327 715 
1978 15 Apr.-5 June 1,248 1.108:44 89 1,389 '2,276 


‘In Braham et al. (1979) an estimate of 2,264 was given for the period from 15 
April to 30 May. The value of 2,276 has a range of uncertainty of approximately 
(—481 to + 601) around the value, and will be further adjusted as results of bias 
analysis dictate. 


The 1978 estimate of 2,276 was higher than indices of 762 
achieved in 1976 (revised from 796, originally quoted in 
Braham and Krogman footnote 2), and 715 in 1977 (Fig. 3). 
The increase in counts is attributable to several factors: 1) In- 
crease in survey effort (period of watch); 2) better survey 
location; 3) environmental conditions; and 4) increase in ob- 
server effort. 

Figure 4 partially illustrates the increase in survey effort by 
comparing the number of hours watched per day during the 
same time frame among years. These histograms illustrate the 
variation in watch effort among years. For all years the stra- 
tegy was to maintain an unbroken 24-h watch schedule. In 
1976 and 1977, the period of OCSEAP funding, this watch- 
effort strategy was undermined by fog, closed leads, unstable 
ice conditions, and a limited number of observers. This was 
not so during 1978, the first year of the NOAA, NMFS ex- 
panded bowhead research program. 

In addition to the outstanding environmental conditions in 
1978, another factor contributing to the increase in the esti- 
mate was a change in location of the ice camps. During 1976 
and 1977 the primary location for counting was 10-20 km to 
the southwest of Point Barrow, where our observers stationed 
themselves near Eskimo whalers. In that vicinity, the lead is 
generally 11-32 km in width, whereas immediately northwest 
of Point Barrow, where the 1978 camps were located, the 
lead width is generally 1-11 km wide. During 1978 the lead 


1976 


= 
< 
{a} 
e I5 18 21 24 27 30 3 6 9 12 I5 18 21 24 27 30 
fe |} aPRiL } MAY 4 
n 
eb 
a) \977 
< 200 
ae 
= 

150 
mw 
o 100 
« 50 
WW 
ale 
5 5 18 21 24 278.30. 3%ie 9°12 IS i8) fel) te4asionso 
2 

— APRIL - MAY = 

eo 
aq 
ee 
io) 
b 


IS) 18. al 24 27, 30%53, 16. 912) SIS ISiire linea raesO) 


May —————_| 


b APRIL { 


Figure 3.—Comparison among years (1976-78) of estimated total number of 
bowhead whales migrating northwardly past Pt. Barrow, Alaska, from 15 April 
to 30 May. For purposes of comparison, totals are based on hourly rates per day 
times 24 h. 


was open wider than 0.5 km approximately 94% of the time 
providing us with an unusually long time period to watch for 
whales. The median as well as mean (of means) lead width, 
23 April to 1 June 1978, at Barrow as 3.70 km (SD = 2.94, 
n = 38) as calculated from data in Brueggeman (1980). A 
lead width of 5 km or less is considered ideal for viewing 
bowheads. 

Another important factor contributing to a higher count 
during 1978 was the increase in observer effort. The 1978 ob- 
server schedule called for two observers per 3-h rotating 
watch; in previous years single observers rotated every 4h. 

Observers at South Camp conducted all watches from an 
unusually high perch (ice ridge) in 1978. Height of the eye at 
South Camp was approximately 11.8 m above sea level yield- 
ing a view to the horizon of 10 km. Observers in 1976 and 
1977 were located on young ice with eye height of 2-4 m, 
yielding a view to the horizon of 4-6 km. 


BwlSercli sca jmesO) Semoun One mloneISsmelin et 27e750 


| ___ ppRi 4 MAY 4 
me (24 = 
is 1977 
b 20 
<< 
= 16 

12 
w 
Oo 

8 
no i 
ce 
= 
oe Un 
= Is I8 21 24 2730 3 6 9 [2 15 18 21 24 27 30 


| ___ apRic 4 MAY | 


5 18 21 24 27 303 6 9 l2 I5 I8 21 24 27 30 


- APRIL } 


MAY ——————_ 


Figure 4.—Comparison among years (1976-78) of observer effort (total hours of 
watch/hour) expended from 15 April to 30 May. The schedule for 1976 and 1977 
called for rotating single observers every 4 h, whereas the 1978 schedule called 
for two teams of two observers each (four total) to rotate every 3 h. Percent of 
total survey hours watched were: 1976 = 37.0%; 1977 = 35.8%; 1978 = 86.7%. 


Cape Lisburne-Point Hope 


Counts of bowhead whales were made 6-16 May 1977 at 
Cape Lisburne, Alaska. This was a feasibility study which 
resulted in 54 bowhead whales counted during 72 h of watch. 
Based upon results of the 1977 study, a full scale counting 
study was conducted 2 April-7 June 1978 (Rugh and Cubbage 
1980). Results of that study indicated that: 1) Spring migration 
of bowhead whales past Cape Lisburne commenced during the 
latter half of April; 2) bowheads generally pass Cape Lisburne 
on a northeasterly course; 3) bowheads usually require 3-5 d to 
traverse the corridor from Cape Lisburne to Point Barrow; 4) 
our counting camps at Point Barrow were established before 
whales passed Cape Lisburne; and 5) few if any whales moved 


past Point Barrow beyond 1 June. These results, and those 
from aerial surveys, indicated that the 1978 counts made at 
Point Barrow probably can be used to estimate abundance. 

Counts of bowhead whales were made at Point Hope from 
18 April to 28 May 1977. A total of 185 bowhead whales was 
observed during 546 h of watch. Two waves of movement 
apparently occurred that year, the first during late April and 
early May and the second during the latter half of May. 


Aerial Surveys for Bowhead and White Whales 


Approximately 75,000 km of tracklines were flown during 
96 flights over the 1975-77 study period. For ease of analysis 
and reporting, these surveys have been chronologically and 
geographically ordered into 16 sets (Appendix I). Survey re- 
sults are reported by month; no surveys were flown during 
November-February. 

Statistics presented in figure captions associated with aerial 
surveys are total number of whales counted, mean group size, 
and standard deviation of group size. Whale counts from the 
air were used as a relative indicator of how many whales 
were present in any given area. Group size described the 
number of whales observed in ‘‘close association’? which 
were counted at any one moment. When more whales sur- 
faced, they were tallied as new sightings. Thus, mean group 
size is downward biased since only a subset of the total group 
was visible near the surface at any given time. 


March and April 
1976 


From 15 to 21 March 1976, four surveys were flown in the 
vicinity of St. Lawrence Island. South of St. Lawrence Island 


teedetp tr bebe betes rect 


! a Ke, ionede 


| & W 
) Chukchi = / [lc / 


= Peninsula 
aie Ro 


th | g¢ 


SS] 


+ 


1-H ee 
Hs 
LS “i 
oP nie Hes 
We a ~ : 
4 aN St. Lawrence = | 
eal SS y cn 
4 SS N d L 
q Bering Sea laine 
Lf 
Hope a a roy] 62 
need Rana Raa Rane GAGs GARE 
172 66 


Figure 5.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering Sea on 15, 18, 
19, and 21 March 1976. No bowheads were observed. Dots depict the presence of 
white whales: a total of 39 were counted with a mean group size of 2.8 and a 
standard deviation (SD) of 2.3. Note: tracklines are not continuous because 
effort was periodically broken in time; plots were drawn by computer and thus 
reflect the actual route taken by the aircraft. 


thin ice coverage was extensive. North of the island there was 
nearly 90% ice coverage and pack ice was thick. No bowhead 
whales were observed. White whales were most common just 
northwest of St. Lawrence Island (Fig. 5). 

During the 6-23 April 1976 survey pack ice was thick be- 
tween lat. 64° and 65°N in the vincinity of St. Lawrence Island. 
South of lat. 64°N pack ice was of medium thickness. Ice 
coverage at this time of year was still extensive: 70-100%; 
80% coverage was most common. Large expanses of 100% 
coverage occurred northwest of St. Matthew Island. South- 
east of St. Matthew Island, and in Bristol Bay, sea ice was 
extensive to the southern limit indicated by aerial survey 
tracklines (Fig. 6). . 

No bowheads were seen during the 6-23 April 1976 survey 
in Bristol] Bay (Fig. 6)'®. Three bowheads were observed in 
the northern Bering Sea, one on 19 April about 20 km south 
of Little Diomede Island (Bering Strait), migrating north- 
easterly in a lead. 


‘One bowhead was observed on 9 April 1976 west of the Pribilof Islands by 
Patrick McGuire, National Marine Mammal Laboratory, from the NOAA ship 
Surveyor. 


69 


—Cape Lisburne 


Point Hope 


Kivalina 


67 


JSS ees 


ipigallonlileye Te 
Is. 


See eee 


fF + 
a 
oH 
He 
: 


i, 
WS 169 GS Sy 
Figure 6.— Aerial survey tracklines flown on 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 


22, and 23 April 1976. Each of the three dots represent a sighting of a bowhead 
whale. No bowheads were observed below lat. 63°N. 


White whales were observed most often in the region from 
northwest of St. Lawrence Island to the Bering Strait during 
the 6-23 April 1976 survey (Fig. 7). Twenty-five white whales, 
18 adults with 7 presumed immatures (grey skin) were seen 
on 9 April in Bristol Bay (Fig. 7). 


1977 


In the region near St. Lawrence Island, aerial surveys were 
flown 31 March-3 April 1977 (Fig. 8). No bowheads were ob- 
served in Norton Sound, but a pair was observed southwest of 
St. Lawrence Island and another, or one of a pair, observed 
later in the same area. Two more were observed in the lead just 
southeast of the Bering Strait. 

During the 31 March-3 April 1977 surveys white whales were 
most common north and west of the west end of St. Lawrence 
Island, and in a large polynya off the coast of the Seward 
Peninsula (Fig. 9). 


May 
1976 


Results from the 30 April to 14 May 1976 (Fig. 10) and the 
15 to 31 May 1976 (Fig. 11) aerial surveys indicate that the 


aaeeee 


Chukchi Sea 


69 


- 


Ws 169 NOS IS? 


Figure 7.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the Bering Sea on 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 
17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 April 1976. Dots depict presence of white whales: a 
total of 135 were counted with a mean group size of 5.4 (SD 6.2). 


ees thes 


q ~~ 5 LI 
} 4 Las 

im Chukchi Sea | 

| 


ce 


64 


) 


INO 


Figure 8.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering and southern 
Chukchi Seas 31 March and 1-3 April 1977. The two dots represent presence of 
bowhead whales: a total of 5 whales were sighted with a mean group size of 1.7 
(SD 0.6). 


T ] Fal ira T 

1 ; 1 i ID oOo! 
i qT ie 

1 Beaufort Sea = 
HH 4 72 
| 4 > Lt 
4 1 
aa eee \ 
Hi / 70 
pen 
LH 
ro f-— 
CAFE EEE bo 
167 161 155 149 143 


Figure 10.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and southern 
Beaufort Seas on 30 April and 1, 3, 8, 9, 12, and 14 May 1976. Dots represent 
presence of bowhead whales: a total of 68 whales were counted with a mean 
group size of 1.3 (SD 0.86). Whales were observed in the nearshore lead only in 
the Chukchi Sea. 


11 


68 


66 


64 


62 


160 


Figure 9.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering and southern 
Chukchi Seas 31 March and 1-3 April 1977. Dots represent presence of white 
whales: a total of 370 whales were counted with a mean group size of 4.6 (SD 4.5). 


NO 


iep) 
[o8) 


arate etal 


164 


(ao a 
158 152 


Figure 11.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 28, and 31 May 1976. Dots represent presence 
of bowhead whales: a total of 30 whales were counted with a mean group size 
equal to 1.2 (SD 0.82). Whales were observed in the nearshore lead only in the 
Chukchi Sea. 


northeast migration of bowhead whales along the northwest 
coast of Alaska (Chukchi Sea) occurred in the nearshore lead. 
No bowheads were seen nearshore in the Beaufort Sea. 
From Figures 12 and 13 it is apparent that white whales were 
more widely distributed in the Chukchi Sea than bowheads. 
They were observed to the northerly limits of most aerial sur- 
veys offshore to approximately 60 km, indicating that they 
penetrate the pack ice even farther north than bowheads. 
White whales were also common in the nearshore lead. 


odds hy 


Masasa 


FAA 
143 


EEE 
149 


= 
ion} 
1 | 


Figure 12.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and Beaufort 
Seas on 30 April and 1, 3, 8, 9, 12, and 14 May 1976. Dots represent presence of 
white whales: a total of 485 whales were counted with a mean group size of 3.9 
(SD 5.5). 


eee eee eee EEE PEE 


pee 4 


Chukchi Sea 


sans anno 


64 158 


mi 


Figure 13.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 28, and 31 May 1976. Dots represent presence of 
white whales: a total of 289 whales were counted with a mean group size of 6.0 
(SD 7.4). 


12 


1977 


Aerial surveys flown from 11 to 14 May 1977 (Fig. 14) in the 
southeastern Chukchi and eastern Bering Seas revealed no 
bowhead whales. It was not expected that bowheads would be 
observed in the area surveyed from Norton Sound south. 

A herd of white whales was encountered on the 11-14 May 
survey in Kotzebue Sound (Fig. 14). Six adult white whales 
were observed in Norton Sound; eight, including one imma- 
ture, were observed south of Norton Sound. The trackline 
leading south from Norton Sound followed near the fast ice 
edge to Nunivak Island. No white whales were observed in 
the open water south of Nunivak Island. 

The hypothesis we proposed, that spring migrating white 
whales use leads offshore in the Beaufort Sea (Braham and 
Krogman footnote 2), is further substantiated when white 
whales were observed as far as 150 km north of Point Barrow 
but not nearshore along the north coast of Alaska in the 
Beaufort Sea (Fig. 15). The fact that no bowheads were seen 
is probably a reflection of fewer animals present nearing the 
end of their spring migration (Fig. 3). 


LH 


OD 
ea) 


OD 
~J 


——.»-@ 


Seward 3} 
Peninsuta 


(op) 
UO) 


Norton 
Sound 


Be Ee ee 


Oo) 
OO 


(op) 


UO) 
(ee) 


hi cs asenns aaa RaSeeeTEETEnEEEEEaeTeseee 


160 


Figure 14.— Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern 
Bering and southeastern Chukchi Seas on 11, 12, and 14 
May 1977. No bowhead whales were seen. Dots repre- 
sent presence of white whales: a total of 272 whales were 
counted with a mean group size of 4.5 (SD 7.6). 


Ree S seee a See ese Sas Sess osos saad ay 
1 H 
H la i 
i / rT | 
HH / 1H 
it po | 
le HH 72 
ee va Beaufort Sea AL 
| 7 Sie 
Hep HL 
| us tT 
[ee a cele ; a 
ii = = : ce T REN ce 70 
CaS REE EEE EERE EEE EEE 

155 149 143 


Figure 15.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the western Beaufort Sea on 21 and 
30 May 1977. No bowhead whales were seen. Dots represent presence of white 
whales: a total of 26 whales were counted with a mean group size of 1.5 (SD 2.5). 


June 
1976 


In early June 1976 the bowhead whale migration along the 
northwest coast of Alaska (Chukchi Sea) was still confined to 
the nearshore lead. From Figure 16, however, it is evident that 
few bowheads were present in the study area. During the 8-14 
June (Fig. 17) aerial surveys in the southern Chukchi and 
northern Bering Seas, two bowheads were observed just south 
of the southern limit of the pack ice edge. They may have been 
waiting for a lead to open, since the pack ice appeared solid 


Bee Et 4 HH 


AS 


=i 


EE meet ele 


elk 


A | SSR 


JOO), 


Figure 16.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 1, 4, and 5 June 1976. Dots represent presence of bowhead 
whales: a total of 20 whales were counted with a mean group size of 1.8 (SD 1.1). 


13 


ey 


oa 


waaad nasaaaa ba ee 


orn 


O) 
CO 


pert tie 
<c 


les 


Seward ®° 


oe 


cPeninsula 


OD 
ep) 


O) 
iS 


O) 
NO 


Spe ele 
163 Loy 


169. 


Figure 17.—Aerial survey tracklines in the northern Bering and southern Chuk- 
chi Seas flown on 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 June 1976. The dot (highlighted by 
an arrow) represents two bowhead whales seen just south of the ice front. One 
whale, a large adult, remained stationary at the surface for the 5-10 min period 
we surveyed the area. 


north of their location. By 18-20 June 1976 the bowhead mi- 
gration along the northwest coast of Alaska was essentially 
over; during aerial surveys flown in the nearshore leads only 
one animal was observed (Fig. 18). 

The 1-5 June 1976 survey along the northwest coast of 
Alaska verified that white whales were still present in the 
Chukchi Sea (Fig. 19). On 1 June, 153 white whales were 
observed at lat. 70°59’'N, long. 158°41’W. All other sight- 
ings were of 12 or fewer whales. 

Eighteen adult white whales were sighted near the mouth 
of the Yukon River on 14 June 1976 (Fig. 20). White whales 
were not encountered elsewhere during the survey, which 
suggests that most had left the north Bering Sea by June and 
that the Yukon Delta sightings were of a group which sum- 
mers in Norton Sound. 

The Chukchi and Beaufort Seas were again surveyed 18-20 
June 1976 (Fig. 21). Only two sightings of white whales were 
made: 12 adults were observed at lat. 70°39'N, long. 161°47’ W 
on 19 June, and 49 adults with 12 immatures were observed 
at lat. 69°28’'N, long. 164°10’W on 20 June. 


ee OS 
1 


161 155 149 143 


Figure 18.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 18-20 June 1976. The dot (highlighted by an arrow) represents 
one bowhead whale seen. 


PEER See eee eee EES | 79 
7] Chukchi Sea / tr} 79 
H f itl 
f--— rT] 
vunesaeeaeaee FERRER ne 
1 


(op) 
on 


SHS) 


ray 
U1 
ww 


Figure 19.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 1, 4, and 5 June 1976. Dots represent presence of white whales: 
a total of 177 whales were counted with a mean group size of 11.1 (SD 32.0). 


July 
No aerial surveys were flown in July 1976, 1977, or 1978. 
August 


Aerial surveys were flown on 17-26 August 1976 over open 
water (Fig. 22). Four bowhead whales were observed together 
on 19 August east of Point Barrow. 

Sighting records of bowhead whales from other OCSEAP 
contractors have been sent to us. In August 1975 Carleton 
Ray'’ sighted 74 bowheads northeast of Icy Cape (about lat. 
70°34'N, long. 161°00'W). Ray’s data and ours from 1975 
suggest that at least some bowheads may not have been able 
to complete their migration into the Beaufort Sea that year 
because of the heavy pack ice. Ice did not restrict their migra- 
tion, however, from 1976 to 1978. 


"C. Ray, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md., pers. commun. 21 Janu- 
ary 1978. 


14 


Chukchi Sea 


66 


feist 
i 


Seward 


- Peninsula 


Hr luad 
2 


v 
a 


¢ 
N, 


ee 


a 


64 


[ 
| 


HEH af 


62 


60 


coche Et 


Sea tae 
News 


38 


WS) 


Figure 20.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering and southern 
Chukchi Seas on 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 June 1976. Dots represent presence 
of white whales: a total of 18 whales were counted with a mean group size of 1.6 
(SD 1.4). 


Le REE ERE EERE EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE EE EEE EEE ] 7.3 

t tr 

Bu ant Beaufort Sea iT] 

Aileen a . tH 71 

E 4. S oo ee i 

q ie 

Hs, 

CSEEEEEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEPEEE PEPE i 
161 55 149 143 


Figure 21.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 18, 19, and 20 June 1976. Dots (highlighted by arrows) repre- 
sent presence of white whales: a total of 73 whales were counted with a mean 
group size of 36.5 (SD 34.6). 


Seven white whales were observed during the 17-26 August 
1976 survey (Fig. 23). Five were observed in Norton Sound, 
none were seen in the Chukchi Sea, and two were seen in the 
north central Beaufort Sea. 


1} | 
LY | 
~] 


isu) 


E ais 
fs 


= 


= 


aa 
7 iE | 


iz 


= 


HS, [eke ry 
as> |i : cL 
rie iF ite ve rr] 6S 
Iie FR LH 
[Sel fie ; 
Ho Saal tr] 83 
ma ae : i t Ht 
Lo T SESS 1 zi 6 
PES EEE EEE EER EEE PEPER EEEREEEEEEEEET ©! 
Gen ice hich). Ise | 46 “142 


Figure 22.— Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering, eastern Chuk- 
chi, and western Beaufort Seas on 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 Au- 
gust 1976 during bird surveys conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 
The dot represents 4 bowhead whales seen just east of Pt. Barrow in open water. 


[-E EEE EEE EEE J 
1-H —— | | | Beaufort Sea IT 
| chukchg—} = "OAS || imi eal 
+{ seal | lp ote 
77 | ea Pea NG 
Hees ett 
Pe = rH 67 
— | E LI a 
HH gs 
LT | 
CI 63 
+t 61 


Figure 23.— Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering, Chukchi, and 
western Beaufort Seas during bird surveys conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wild- 
life Service on 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 August 1976. Dots repre- 
sent presence of white whales: a total of 7 whales were counted with a mean 
group size of 1.2(SD 0.4). 


September and October 


During the 20-26 September 1976 survey an aggregration of 
bowhead whales was observed nearshore from Smith Bay to 
Point Barrow (Fig. 24). The highest count was 47 on 21 Sep- 
tember. Several animals were observed to be stationary at the 
surface with their mouths open; they appeared to be feeding. 
The area between Smith Bay and Point Barrow may be a stag- 
ing area for migrating whales and/or an important feeding lo- 
cation during years of high invertebrate production. It is likely 
these animals, and perhaps more, summered in this region in 
1976. A few Eskimo whalers from Barrow have told us that 
this is not an uncommon occurrence. Tracklines were flown 
offshore during this period in 1976 but no bowheads were 
observed. 

Results were inconclusive as to whether or not bowheads 
congregate every year nearshore east of Point Barrow. Dur- 
ing a 12-22 September 1974 aerial survey by Fiscus and Mar- 
quette'* many bowheads were observed near Cape Simpson; 
the highest count, 57, was made on 18 September 1974. Dur- 
ing the 26 August-13 October 1977 survey, however, only 
seven bowheads were observed in the area (Fig. 25). Of sig- 
nificance, though, was that most of the 1977 sightings were 
made offshore, probably of whales on their return migration 
from the Beaufort Sea into the Chukchi Sea. 

Although the data are sparse, they indicate that bowheads 
move west and south in September. We have, as does C. Ray, 
sightings that place bowheads at three locations during Sep- 
tember: 1) East along the northern coast of Alaska to within 


'*Fiscus, C. H., and W. M. Marquette. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Ser- 
vice field studies relating to the bowhead whale harvest in Alaska, 1974. Pro- 
cessed rep., 23 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Northwest and Alaska Fish. Cent., 
Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, 
WA 98115. 


Seeeeeee 93 


bey tH fap 


17 Sea 
| 


Wl 


Chukchi Sea 


69 


fot 
157 15 


Figure 24.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 20, 21, 22, 24, and 26 September 1976. Dots represent presence 
of bowhead whales: a total of 102 whales were counted with a mean group size of 
2.7 (SD 3.5). 


| 


pls — Ht 
a ~\ | tt 
E os | | | 1 

< 

LH / | Beaufort Sea H | 
1 ieee : | i 
1 chukchi sea Be. 2 H 
E Vole 4 Dee NC EL 


- 
th 
| 
4 
Ed 
gE 
=e 


EPEAT 
165 159 153 147 


Figure 25.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 26 and 29 August 1977; 1, 5, 8, 10, and 14 September 1977; and 
3, 6, and 13 October 1977. Dots represent presence of bowhead whales: a total of 
7 whales were counted in September and October with a mean group size of 1.2 
(SD 0.4). No whales were observed in August 1977. 


100 km of Point Barrow; 2) south of Barrow along the coast 
to Peard Bay, lat. 70°50'N, long. 158°30’W; and 3) west of 
Point Barrow some 100 km into the Chukchi Sea. 

One white whale was observed during the 20-26 September 
1976 survey (Fig. 26). Eighty-nine white whales were ob- 
served on the 26 August-13 October 1977 survey (Fig. 27). 
The westward migration of white whales past Point Barrow 
appears to be predominantly offshore. 

No bowheads were seen on the 9-14 October 1975 survey 
conducted over the southern Chukchi and northern Bering 
Seas (Fig. 28). A. Berzin'® reported seeing bowhead whales 
near the Soviet coast of the Chukotka Peninsula during sur- 


"9A. A. Berzin, TINRO, Magadan, U.S.S.R., pers. commun. 14 February 
1979. 


Se ee a ee eat 
ii LI 
f Jie Ne 
iH vA / | 
du yy + | 
Uf Beaufort pall | . 
Chukchi Sea 71 


=== 


1 ° 10 


{ 


= iti etal sn 
163 157 151 


Figure 26.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 20, 21, 22, 24, and 26 September 1976. The dot (highlighted by 
an arrow) represents one white whale seen. 


SReSSeie: 


ta 


Chukchi Sea 


Seba 


a 


sueiiinailt 


165 159 


Figure 27.—Aerial survey tracklines flown in the eastern Chukchi and western 
Beaufort Seas on 26 and 29 August 1977; 1, 5, 8, 10, and 14 September 1977; and 
3, 6, and 13 October 1977. Dots represent presence of white whales: a total of 89 
whales were counted with a mean group size of 4.0 (SD 3.5). All but 3 of the 89 
whales were observed on 10 and 14 September. 


: EEE E EEE EEE EEE | 59 
Chukchi Sea———_____\_ t | 


t 4 


| \ 
| eda 
ea 


ane Ht 
ee i 
rT] tis, ) 6 
TI wiSs Pag ¥ So seaward 3 
=hi| ¥ wane Peninsula - nly 
| : CL] 
ia TT 


C 
—— 


64 


aseseaeaaa! 


62 


60 


(vee 
“any 
HEE 


ka 
N 

‘ 
a 


chebebeo bee et bt edt ba 


2 
EH 
Fi 
Li 

a 


ia Le 


170 164 158 


Figure 28.— Aerial survey tracklines flown in the northern Bering and southern 
Chukchi Seas on 9, 12, and 14 October 1975. No bowhead or white whales were 
observed. 


veys conducted in October 1974 and 1975 (Fig. 29). His sight- 
ing (in Fig. 29), commercial whaling records (Fig. 2), and our 
results reported in Johnson et al. (1981) indicate that at least 
some, and perhaps most, bowheads migrate to the northern 
coast of Siberia in the autumn before moving south through 
the Bering Strait and into the Bering Sea to their wintering 
grounds. 


170° E 


UrAS = 


180° 175° W 170° W 165° W 160° W 


Wrangel | 


O April (1976-79) 


Figure 29.—Bowhead whale sightings in the Bering and southern 
Chukchi Seas, 1974-79, from aerial and vessel surveys. October sight- 
ings were provided by A. Berzin, pers. commun. For greater detail 
see Braham et al. (1980b). 


loa 


70° N 
CHUKCHI 
O June ( 1976-77) Lp Rowen 
hed 
0) August (1976) . G Sound 
A October (1974-75) : 
Chukotskiy 
Peninsula 
65° N 
Anastasia Bay 
In Bogoslof | ®& Nunivak | 
“St. Matthew | 60° N 
° 
ZS 
BERING SEA %, 
aN 
ve 55° N 


Twenty large, apparently adult bowheads were observed 
north of Point Barrow at lat. 71°N between long. 156° and 
157°W on 22 October 1978 (Savage 1978*°). The animals 
were following a large, slow moving ice floe and appeared to 
be feeding. As ice appeared to cover the Beaufort Sea east of 
long. 152°W on this date, Savage felt that these sightings 
were made near the end of the autumn westward migration. 
Details of the few other sightings made in October 1978 and 
the unsuccessful aerial survey effort of the area around Prud- 
hoe Bay in September 1978 are reported in Braham et al. 
(1980d). 


DISCUSSION AND REVIEW 


Western Arctic-Bering Sea Population 
of Bowhead Whales 


Distribution and Migration 


Bowhead whales of the western Arctic-Bering Sea stocks oc- 
cur seasonally from the west central Bering Sea northward 
along the coast of Siberia and around St. Lawrence Island in 
the northern Bering Sea, throughout the Chukchi Sea, and in 


Savage, S. 1978. Distribution of B. mysticetus and D. leucas in the Beaufort 
Sea, October 1978. Unpubl. manuscr., 11 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. 
Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 
98115. 


Aleutian Is. , © Vi 
a 


, 


: Bae atc 


PEACH EE te ONCE SARIN, 


fewer numbers in the eastern East Siberian Sea, and eastward 
throughout the U.S. Beaufort Sea to Banks Island and Amund- 
sen Gulf, Northwest Territories, Canada (Fig. 1). 

The exact location of the wintering area for bowheads is not 
known, but the western and central Bering Sea appear to be 
the most probable location (Sleptsov 1961; Durham footnote 
10; Braham and Krogman footnote 2; Braham et al. 1980b, c; 
Brueggeman 1982). Results from our icebreaker survey in 
March and April 1979 indicated that bowheads winter in the 
west central Bering Sea pack ice (Braham et al. 1980c). Com- 
ments made to Braham by A. Berzin (footnote 19) indicate 
that in some years a few bowheads may winter in open water in 
the Gulf of Anadyr. The waters around St. Lawrence Island 
are occupied intermittently by bowheads, dependent upon 
open water, from approximately December to April (Braham 
et al. 1980c, d). Past whaling records and reported observa- 
tions by Alaskan Eskimos support the hypothesis that bow- 
head winter distribution is south and west of St. Lawrence 
Island to the pack ice front and perhaps farther south into 
open water. Townsend’s (1935) records of bowhead whale 
catches and recent data from Bockstoce and Botkin (footnote 
13) show that large numbers of whales were taken from Cape 
Olyutorskiy north to the Gulf of Anadyr, U.S.S.R., and ad- 
joining waters during early spring and summer during com- 
mercial whaling when bowheads were more abundant than 
now. Few whales were taken or have been observed in the east- 
ern Bering Sea, despite extensive aerial and shipboard surveys. 
Of those sightings in the eastern Bering Sea over the Continen- 


tal Shelf, most were in the vicinity of the Pribilof Islands 
(Townsend 1935) and St. Matthew Island (Hanna 1920; 
Braham et al. 1980c). In April 1976, at least two bowheads 
were seen in outer and southern Bristol Bay representing the 
most southeastwardly sighting of the species (Fig. 29). 

The northward spring migration of the bowhead whale from 
the Bering Sea is timed with the breakup of the pack ice (Bailey 
and Hendee 1926; Foote 1964*'; Nishiwaki 1967; Durham 
footnote 11). This generally occurs in April (Sleptsov 1961; 
McVay 1973) or earlier in a mild ice year (as in 1979). At that 
time, most whales travel north through the Strait of Anadyr, 
between St. Lawrence Island and the Chukchi Peninsula, con- 
tinuing north by northeast through the Bering Strait probably 
on the Soviet side, west of Big Diomede Island (Braham et al. 
1979). During an ‘‘average’’ ice year, apparently few animals 
migrate through the eastern half of the northern Bering Sea— 
heavier ice usually occurs there than to the west. Even so, 
Eskimo whalers at Wales periodically take bowheads along the 
Alaska coast near the Bering Strait (Marquette footnote 14; 
Johnson et al. 1981). Most of the migrating animals have 
passed through this corridor between St. Lawrence Island and 
the coast of the Chukotka Peninsula by mid-May (Bailey and 
Hendee 1926; Foote footnote 21; Durham footnote 10; Bur- 
gess 1973; Braham and Krogman footnote 2; Braham et al. 
1979, 1980c). 

Upon entering the Chukchi Sea the migration is northeast- 
erly across outer Kotzebue Sound in leads occurring in the 
flaw zone. A few whales move into a polynya that character- 
istically forms between Kivalina and Point Hope, but most 
whales move past Point Hope, some offshore to 45-90 km 
(Braham et al. 1980b). A few whales might migrate into the 
western Chukchi Sea in spring; however, this is unlikely since 
pack ice is extensive with few leads north of the Chukotka 
Peninsula (Braham et al. 1979; G. Fedoseev**). Apparently, 
Siberian Eskimos living along the north side of the Chukotka 
Peninsula did not hunt bowheads in the spring as did their 
counterparts along the east side of the Peninsula (A. Berzin, 
footnote 19). 

Proceeding northerly on a heading of 10°-20° magnetic 
(Braham et al. 1980d) bowheads follow open leads north past 
Cape Thompson and Point Hope and then northeasterly to 
Cape Lisburne and Point Barrow. The migration past Cape 
Lisburne seems to follow two or more corridors, depending 
on the number of leads, 2-10 km offshore; sightings have 
been made to 15 km offshore (Rugh and Cubbage 1980). No 
bowheads have been observed in offshore leads between 
Point Lay and Point Barrow during 4 yr of aerial surveys, 
even though aerial survey time has been split equally between 
offshore (to 100 km) and nearshore coverage (Braham and 
Krogman footnote 2; Braham et al. 1979, 1980c, d). The 
majority of bowheads have usually passed Point Hope by 
mid-May (Foote footnote 21; Johnson et al. 1966) and occur 
in peak numbers at this time at Point Barrow (Maher and 
Wilimovsky 1963; Fiscus and Marquette footnote 18; Bra- 


*'Foote, D. C. 1964. Observations of the bowhead whale at Pt. Hope, Alaska. 
Unpubl. manuscr., 73 p. Natl Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., 
NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 

2G. Fedoseev, Pacific Scientific Research Institute of Fisheries Oceanography, 
Magadan, Nagaevskaya, 51, 685013, U.S.S.R., pers. commun. 28 February 
1979. 


ham and Krogman footnote 2; Braham et al. 1979, 1980c). 
The migration along the northwest coast (Bering Strait to 
Point Barrow) essentially covers the period mid-April to early 
June, with a few whales migrating by thereafter, according 
to our work to date. 

Previous authors and numerous Eskimo whalers describe 
the bowhead migration as occurring in three waves or pulses 
of whales that pass by the northwest coast each spring (Foote 
footnote 21; Marquette footnote 14). Examination of Figure 
3 confirms that at least two pulses of whales migrated past 
Point Barrow in 1976, 1977, and 1978. These pulses appeared 
to occur in late April-early May and again near mid-May. A 
third pulse may occur in late May or early June; but our data 
either do not support this or the peak is small. The signifi- 
cance of this bimodal, or trimodal, distribution is not clear, 
but Eskimo whalers associate it with age, sex, and/or segre- 
gation of cow-calf pairs from other adults in the population. 
This cannot be confirmed from sightings and harvest data 
collected between 1975 and 1980. 

From Point Barrow the whales travel northeasterly into the 
Beaufort Sea to Banks Island and Amundsen Gulf, Canada, 
some by early May (Braham and Krogman footnote 2; Fraker 
et al. 1978; Braham et al. 1979). Leads do occur closer to 
shore, but no whales were seen in them (Figs. 10, 15, 18), nor 
are the nearshore leads extensive. Further evidence in support 
of the hypothesis that bowhead and white whales migrate 
offshore in the Beaufort Sea in the spring independently pro- 
posed by Braham and Krogman (footnote 2) and Fraker 
(1977)*? is reported in Braham et al. (1979, 1980d). The por- 
tion of the population which enters Canadian waters com- 
pared with the number passing Point Barrow is unknown. In 
the Canadian Beaufort Sea bowheads remain from May until 
late August or September (Cook 1926; Townsend 1935; Foote 
footnote 21; Sergeant and Hoek 1974; Fraker et al. 1978) be- 
fore beginning the return autumn migration west. From June 
to September bowheads are reported to frequent Amundsen 
Gulf, Franklin Bay, Coronation Gulf, the east side of the 
Mackenzie Delta, and various areas south of Banks Island 
(Cook 1926; Townsend 1935; Anderson 1946; Porsild 1950; 
Manning and MacPherson 1958; Sergeant and Hoek 1974; 
Allen 1978; Fraker et al. 1978). 

In August and September bowheads begin to leave the 
eastern Beaufort Sea on their autumn migration back to the 
Bering Sea (Cook 1926). The whales travel west in the south- 
ern Beaufort Sea, where they are hunted during September 
and October by Alaskan Eskimos from Kaktovik, Nuiqsut, 
and Barrow (Brower 1942; Maher and Wilimovsky 1963; 
Marquette footnote 14). Whales traveling this route have 
been sighted or harvested near Herschel Island (Cook 1926; 
Townsend 1935); Barter Island (Marquette footnote 14), 
Cross Island?*; Colville River and Harrison Bay (Brower 
1942); and Cape Simpson and Plover Islands (Braham and 
Krogman footnote 2; A. Brower**). Their spatial distribution 
from the shore to the pack ice during the autumn migration 
is not known, but it is likely to be dependent on ice condi- 
tions, food availability, and water depths. Sightings made in 


**Fraker, M. A. 1977. The 1976 white whale monitoring program, Mackenzie 
Estuary, N.W.T. Imperial Oil Ltd. Unpubl. rep., 73 p. F. F. Slancy & Co., Ltd., 
Vancouver, B.C., Can. 

**T. Brower, Barrow, Alaska, pers. commun. 4 October 1977. 

>A. Brower, Barrow, Alaska, pers. commun. 19 May 1978. 


the Beaufort Sea since 1974 (Figs. 24-27, 30, 31) indicate 
that bowheads are distributed from shallow coastal waters to 
the pack ice and perhaps into the pack ice. The numerous 
sightings in shallow water from Point Barrow to Smith Bay 
(Fig. 30) seem to confirm the importance of the nearshore 
areas to this species in the western Beaufort Sea. 

From Point Barrow the animals appear to move westerly 
to Herald Shoal and Herald and Wrangel Islands (Cook 
1926; Townsend 1935; Bockstoce 1977), then south through 
the Chukchi Sea into the Bering Sea. There is speculation by 
Soviet scientists that bowheads pass to the Bering Sea by 
traveling the western Chukchi Sea. Some animals appear to 
move southwest along the northwest coast of Alaska past 
Point Barrow to the Bering Strait, but this probably varies 
with weather and ice conditions. Most in the population mi- 
grate to the north side of the Chukotka Peninsula before 
entering the Bering Sea (Fig. 2; Townsend 1935; Johnson et 
al. 1981). Johnson et al. (1966) and F. Durham’® believed 
that the fall migration through the Chukchi Sea followed an 
offshore passage, since bowheads were not seen at Wain- 
wright, Cape Thompson, Point Hope, or Kivalina in the 
autumn during their studies. Simultaneous sightings of bow- 
heads in the eastern Beaufort and western Chukchi Seas sug- 
gest that 1) there is a division in the autumn migration, with 
some whales leaving the Beaufort Sea perhaps as early as 
July and/or August; and/or 2) there are two subpopulations 
(i.e., that a later component of the spring migration moves 
into the Chukchi Sea and remains there in summer not com- 
pleting the migration into the Beaufort Sea). Preliminary 
data presented earlier and in Braham et al. (1980b) suggest 
the first hypothesis is the more likely one. 


°F. Durham, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., pers. commun. 21 
September 1978. 


154° 152° 


————— ————————— 1 1 


148° 


Bowheads generally enter the northern Bering Sea in No- 
vember and December, although sometimes they are seen in 
late September, arriving in central Bering Sea wintering areas 
in December-February.?’ 


Life History and Associated Information 
Reproduction 


Facts about the reproductive biology of the bowhead whale 
are scant, though information gathered on animals harvested 
by Alaskan Eskimos has provided opportunities to study this 
species’ reproductive cycle. A summary of some estimated 
reproductive life history data is reported in Table 2. 

Sexual maturity is reached when animals attain lengths ex- 
ceeding 1,100 cm. Durham (1979, footnote 10) reported that 
males attain sexual maturity at 1,158 cm (38 ft) and females 
at 1,220 cm (40 ft) at 4 yr of age. Marquette (footnote 14) 
noted that two female whales taken at Barrow, one accom- 
panied by a newborn calf and the other containing a fetus, 
measured 1,525 cm (50 ft) and 1,730 cm (56 ft 6 in) long, 
respectively. From the presence of corpora albicantia in 
ovaries of 12 whales harvested in 1978 and 1979, sexual ma- 
turity in females may be reached at about 1,200 cm (pre- 
liminary findings); and adult females are larger than males 
(Johnson et al. 1981). Age, and length at first pregnancy, 
however, are unknown. 

The mating period of the bowhead whale is not well known. 
Durham (footnote 10) maintained that mating occurs in early 
April before the whales reach Point Hope. Foote (footnote 
21), however, observed what appeared to be copulatory be- 


7D. Harry and C. Oozeva, Gambell, Alaska, pers. commun. 25 July 1978 and 
25 February 1979, respectively. 


146° 144° 142 


BEAUFORT SEA 


Figure 30.—Bowhead whale sightings in the Beaufort Sea, August through November 1974-78. Only sightings with a verified position were used. Most sightings occurred 
in the last half of September. The dash line represents the 12 m depth contour. 


=e Approximate edge of pack ice 
Siege "September 1974 


Banks 


Island 


a coat BEAUFORT SEA 
ee < 
4 = 
I \ — 
~ 
na | 
Ra } . | 
a: | ( }N 
~~ |An ice : [ENS 
K. island [e- : e 
WrangelIsTand y r S * 4 \f ee Ses e UU ESth ham : Laote 
a — NCE oe RN eee tee 
g TS ING ANS ia ae 
Herold Bank \ Sea / Paaray Herachelill <¥) 
Ao < > = © om 
gS ey i, 23 
\ Bigass ES \ \ ~ Mackenzie River 
CHUKCHI SIEZAPN " AAU 
\ =e Sf = 
x \ 
\ 
Point Hope \ 
\ 
\ CANADA 
< \ 
ve 
> Ss RY \ 
iS Sar i ALASKA \ 
eee \ 
\ 
\ \ \ 
\ 
Nome \ 
Unalokleet \ 
e \ 
\ \ 
St. errence L a, | \ \ \ j 
175°W 170° 165° RY 160° 155° \ 150° NGS: 140 
Br ES \ pes \ 


Figure 31.—Aerial survey tracklines flown by NMFS scientists, September 1974. Bowhead whale sightings in the Beaufort Sea are incorporated into Figure 30. (From 
Fiscus and Marquette text footnote 15.) 


havior in May, as whales passed Point Hope. Copulatory 
behavior was also reported by Krogman (1977) and Everitt 
and Krogman (1979) in May north of Point Barrow. Mating 
behavior of Atlantic bowheads was reported in late summer 
(Scoresby 1820). Possible copulation was witnessed on 16 
March 1979 west of St. Matthew Island (Braham et al. 1980c). 
Mating may therefore occur from late winter to summer, 
with spring (April-June) being the more probable peak period. 

Gestation is estimated to last 1 yr Scoresby (1820) believed 
that bowheads have a 9-10 mo gestation period, while Esch- 
richt and Reinhardt (1866) believed it to be 13-14 mo. Dur- 
ham (1980, footnote 10) reported from observations of har- 
vested bowheads taken at Point Hope and Barrow that the 
gestation period is 12 mo. The actual length, however, is still 
unknown. Minimum gross annual reproductive rate (calves 
per total population) has been estimated at 1-5.6% (Davis 
and Koski 1980; Cubbage and Rugh 1982; Marquette et al. 
1982). 

The calving period is reported to correspond with the time 
of mating—early spring to early summer. Cows with calves 
pass Point Hope and Point Barrow from mid-April to early- 
June (Maher and Wilimovsky 1963; Marquette 1976; Braham 


20 


et al. 1979). Whalers in the eastern Arctic reported seeing 
apparent cows with calves from early May to July (Gray 
1886). Durham (footnote 10) believed that bowhead whales 
in the western Arctic calve in early April. Eschricht and Rein- 
hardt (1866) in the eastern Arctic Canada reported calving 
occurring from late March to early May. Most researchers 
agree that a single calf is born. 

Although recognizing that parturition has never been ob- 
served, our scant sightings of calves indicate that bowheads 
probably give birth in spring, perhaps a few before (February- 
March) but most during migration (April-June). Marquette 
(footnote 14), summarizing the known data on calving, pro- 
vided information that bowheads may calve from April 
through August. Observations of calves in the spring (Bra- 
ham et al. 1979, 1980b) and apparent copulatory behavior in 
the late winter (Braham et al. 1980c) and spring (Everitt and 
Krogman 1979) with no sightings reported for the autumn, 
also indicate that the peak period of mating and calving is 
March-June, with few calves being born in summer or 
autumn. 

The length of newborn calves has been measured at 305- 
460 cm (10-15 ft) (Scoresby 1820; Durham 1980). Bodfish 


Table 2.—Summary of some estimated reproductive life history data for bowhead whales. 


Life history Parameter Area data 
parameter value collected Reference 
Sexual maturity 
Males > 11m Chukchi Sea Durham (text footnote 11) 
Females > 12m Chukchi Sea Durham (text footnote 11); 
Johnson et al. (1981) 
Calving and 
mating period Mar.-May No. Atlantic Eschricht and Reinhardt (1866) 
Mar.-June Bering to Beaufort Braham and Krogman (text footnote 2); 
Seas Braham et al. (1979, 1980c); 
Everitt and Krogman (1979) 
April Chukchi Sea Durham (text footnote 11) 
Apr.-June Chukchi Sea Maher and Wilimovsky (1963); 
Marquette (1976) 
Apr.-Aug. Western and Summarized in Marquette 
eastern Arctic (text footnote 15) 
May Chukchi Sea Foote (text footnote 23) 
May-July No. Atlantic Gray (1886) 
Gestation 9-10mo_ No. Atlantic Scoresby (1820) 
12 mo Chukchi Sea Durham (1980) 
13-14mo_ No. Atlantic Eschricht and Reinhardt (1866) 
Lactation 5-6mo _ Beaufort Sea Marquette (text footnote 15) 
12 mo No. Atlantic Slijper (1962) 
711-85l1cm  — Tomilin (1957) 
(calf length) 
Gross annual '1-5.6% Chukchi and Davis and Koski (1980); 


reproductive 
rate (GARR) 


Arctic 


Beaufort Seas, 
and eastern 
Canadian High 


Cubbage and Rugh (1982); 
Marquette et al. (1982) 


‘Considered a minimum estimate when compared with estimates for other large baleen whales. 


(1936) estimated the length of newborns at 305-366 cm (10-12 
ft); Eschricht and Reinhardt (1866) reported lengths of 366 to 
396 cm (13-14 ft). An apparent newborn calf taken at Barrow 
20 May 1954 was measured by Eskimos at 300-350 cm (10-12 
ft) (Marquette footnote 14). According to these findings the 
average length of a newborn bowhead whale is about 360 cm 
(12 ft). One bowhead calf with attached umbilicus taken at 
Barrow in 1971 or 1972, was estimated (no measurements 
made) by resident Eskimo whalers to be about ‘‘20 ft’’ long, 
or 615 cm.** This is unusually large for a newborn, if the 
estimate was accurate. 

Information on the duration of the lactation period in 
bowheads is scant and variable. Slijper (1962) reported the 
lactation period to be 12 mo. Marquette (footnote 14) stated 
that since lactating females have not been recorded in the 
autumn take near Barrow, lactation may last only 5 or 6 mo. 
Tomilin (1957) reported that lactation ends and calves are 
weaned at a length of 711-851 cm (23-28 ft). Although incon- 
clusive, it appears that bowheads have a 6-12 mo lactation 
period. Since yearlings are not seen in very close association 
with adults in spring, it seems unlikely that lactation lasts 1 yr. 
Lactation in gray whales last approximately 4 mo (Rice and 
Wolman 1971). 

Based on the estimated lactation and gestation periods, the 
calculated calving interval for female bowhead whales is at 
least 2 yr and is likely to be longer. Large, long-lived mam- 
mals are characterized in having calving intervals of more 
than 2 yr (Fowler and Smith 1973; Goodman 1978). 


*O. Leavitt and J. Adams, Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission, Barrow, 
Alaska, pers. commun. 15 May 1978. 


21 


Food Habits 


Nemoto (1976) classified the bowhead whale as a bottom 
skimmer, and although individuals have been observed feeding 
in shallow waters, bowhead probably feed throughout the 
water column. A comprehensive study of bowhead feeding has 
not been conducted; however, the small data base from the 
available literature indicated that pelagic arthropods (euphau- 
siids, mysids, pteropods, copepods, and amphipods) are the 
prey species mostly taken, and, to a lesser extent, annelids, 
molluscs, and echinoderms (Mitchell 1975; Marquette footnote 
14; Lowry et al. 1978). Johnson et al. (1966) examined the stom- 
ach contents of three bowhead whales taken by Point Hope Es- 
kimos in the spring. The stomachs were empty and the third 
contained fragmentary remains of polychaetes, reptantia, gas- 
tropods, crustaceans, echinoids, and sand and gravel. Lowry et 
al. (1978) analyzed the stomach contents of two bowhead whales 
taken at Point Barrow in the fall of 1977 and found that together 
they contained (by volume) 90.3% euphausiids (Thysanoessa 
raschil), 6.9% gammarid amphipods (Gammarus zaddachi, 
Acanthostepheia_ behringiensis, Monculoides zernovi, and 
Rozinante fragilis), and 2.7% hyperiid amphipods (Para- 
themisto libellula). Five bowheads taken by Kaktovik whalers 
off Barter Island in autumn 1979 had primarily euphausiids 
and copepods (Ca/anus spp.) in their stomachs (Lowry and 
Burns 1980). A 1-yr study of bowhead feeding contracted by 
us to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fairbanks, 
determined that competition for food with Arctic cod may be 
important in some years if food is limiting (Frost and Lowry 


1981)??. Of the 17 bowhead whale stomachs and intestinal 
tracts examined to date from whales landed at Barrow and 
Kaktovik with discernable prey items present, the following 
proportions in the bowhead diet were: Euphausiids 65%; 
copepods 30%; hyperiid amphipods 1%; and all others, pri- 
marily including amphipods, 4% (see Marquette et al. 1982 
for a summary of Frost and Lowry footnote 29). 


Behavior 


Essentially all bowheads progress steadily through the near- 
shore lead during the spring migration along the northwest coast 
of Alaska, following a fairly straight course towards the north- 
east (20 °-30° magnetic north). Since the NMFS ice camp studies 
were initiated in 1976, < 1% of all bowheads were seen going 
southwest in the spring (Carroll and Smithhisler 1980). The rare 
exceptions occurred when the lead was obstructed by ice, or 
when the whales were resting, feeding (presumably), courting, 
mating, or breaching. Most whales progressed past the ice camp 
at a rate of 1.9-7.5 km/h (1.0-4.0 nmi/h) depending on the 
direction of the current; this rate of travel was confirmed by 
studies at Cape Lisburne (Rugh and Cubbage 1980). 

Bowheads do not travel in close association with one an- 
other. Of 2,406 bowhead observations recorded between 
1976 and 1978, 1,815 (75.4%) were singles, 470 (19.5%) were 
in pairs, 105 (4.4%) were in groups of three, and 16 (0.7%) 
were in groups of 4. There were noticeable peaks during the 
course of the migration, sometimes related to ice conditions, 
but also at times when the whales had free movement in the 
lead. 

When bowheads come to the surface to breathe, they usu- 
ally break the water surface from 1 to 14 times, with each 
surfacing (roll) interrupted by a short shallow dive. Exhala- 
tion is not always observed during each roll. A completed 
series of rolls is termed a rise (= total number of rolls visible 
during a passage of one whale in front of an observer). The 
mean number of rolls per rise recorded from 1975 to 1977 
was 6.57 (SD = 3.08; n = 63), while the mean in 1978 was 
6.53 (SD = 2.84; n = 41) (Carroll and Smithhisler 1980). 

Each time a bowhead rolled it was on the surface for a 
mean of 4.7 s (SD = 2.0). The average time below the sur- 
face between blows (= rolls) was 10.8 s (SD = 5.2). From 
this we calculated that the average amount of time a bow- 
head was above the surface per rise was about 31 s. The 
average duration of arise between the first roll and the sound- 
ing dive was 1.5 min. 

The duration of sounding dives varied from 3.0 to 26.7 
min. The mean dive time recorded during the 1975-77 spring 
seasons was 15.2 min (SD = 4.4). Of 51 dives times in 1978 
the mean was 15.6 min (SD = 5.2). Combining these with 
the 1.5 min mean rise time, a time of 17.1 min was calculated 
for the complete cycle. On the basis of these data, we esti- 
mate that during their migration near Barrow, bowhead 
whales were visible above the water surface 3.1% of the time 
within the field of view of our ice camp observer(s). Using 


»*Frost, K., and L. Lowry. 1981. Feeding and trophic relationships of bow- 
head whales and other vertebrate consumers in the Beaufort Sea. Final report to 
Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Contract No. 80-ABC-00160, 106 p. Northwest and 
Alaska Fish. Cent., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA. Unpubl. manuscr., Alaska 
Dep. Fish Game, 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, AK 99701. 


22 


the same basic calculations, bowheads were visible to aircraft 
observers for approximately 8.4% of the time they were 
under observation. 

The surfacing pattern of a cow and calf pair seems to be 
related to the calf’s activity. Of three cow and calf pairs 
timed, mean dive time was 6.6 min (range 5.9-7.0 min). Calves 
often blew two times during each roll. Very small calves were 
seen during the migration, usually traveling very close to the 
accompanying adult. We judged these calves to be recently 
born. 

Bowheads move steadily through partially closed leads by 
adjusting their diving and surfacing sequences to the size and 
location of open water in the pack ice. They take fewer breaths 
per rise and make shorter dives. A whale coming to a small 
polynya will roll as many times as it has time, while traveling 
at a normal speed, then dive when it comes to the distant 
edge. 

Occasionally, the ice cover was so complete that the whales’ 
progress was hindered and they were seen milling in polynyas. 
It appears that the whales dive, search, and, if they do not 
find another polynya close enough, return to the original 
hole. Sea ice is more flexible than freshwater ice and both 
bowheads and white whales push up on the ice to breathe, 
forming hummocks. Bowheads have been heard exhaling 
under the ice when no apparent open water is available.*° 

Apparently bowheads are not always successful in finding 
open water or in being able to lift pack ice to breathe. Tomi- 
lin (1957) and Southwell (1898) both cited instances of bow- 
heads perishing in the ice, and Sleptsov (1961) stated that 
there was a mass mortality of several dozen bowheads in 
Karaginsky Bay in 1932. Cook (1926) also reported bow- 
heads perishing under ice during the autumn in the Beaufort 
Sea. Unfortunately, the details of these events were not re- 
ported. 

Bowheads do not seem habituated to small boats. The 
sound of an outboard motor will cause a bowhead to vacate 
an area. The normal reaction to being pursued is escape. 
If a bowhead is injured, it will often dive under the ice. Re- 
action to airplanes flying overhead seems mixed. Few whales 
have reacted vigorously to our presence when we fly between 
130 and 300 m. On a few occasions we have flown above 
whales at 65 m without obvious disturbance (c.f. photos in 
Everitt and Krogman 1979 where altitudes were down to 65 
m). In 160 encounters using a Coast Guard helicopter and 
flying at elevations below 300 m only 17 (11%) bowheads ap- 
peared to react noticeably to the aircraft noise. The same re- 
sults occurred at altitudes down to 130 m (Braham et al. 
1980c). It appears then that fright reaction to noise varies 
greatly, depending upon the source, time of year, environ- 
mental conditions, and activity of the animals. Surface noises 
in water appear to cause more frequent fright reactions by 
bowheads than noises originating above them in the air. 

Occasionally bowheads show considerable exuberance. We 
have observed them breaching, tail lobbing, flipper slapping, 
swimming on their backs and sides, and demonstrating other 
behavior. Along with numerous tail lobs and flipper slaps, a 
whale seen off Point Hope in 1977 breached 57 times in 96 
min. We do not know the significance of these kinds of 


°F skimo whalers, pers. commun. 1976-79. 


activities, but they may indicate communication (Rugh and 
Cubbage 1980). 

During the autumn migration bowheads may travel in 
larger groups than in spring. Groups of 2-30 animals have 
been recorded in the Canadian Beaufort Sea (Sergeant and 
Hoek 1974), and several groups up to 20 animals each were 
seen in September of 1974 and 1976 east of Point Barrow. 
Unfortunately, the composition of these groups or their 
specific activities during the fall migration are not known. 


Occurrence of Bowheads in Outer 
Continental Shelf Lease Areas 


Outer Bristol Bay-St. George Basin 


Bowhead whales probably occur in the southeastern Bering 
Sea only during the late winter and early spring months when 
the seasonal pack ice front extends south of lat. 60°N, and 
then in low numbers. Only three sightings have been made in 
this area between 1976 and 1980, with one of those in 1976 un- 
doubtedly being a duplicate west of St. Paul Island (Fig. 29). 
During the height of commercial whaling very few bowheads 
were taken in the southeastern Bering Sea even at a time when 
the population was at its apparent maximum size (Fig. 2, 
Bockstoce and Botkin footnote 13). It seems unlikely that 
animals would have been missed during commercial whaling 
Operations as many ships traveled there enroute to Alaskan 
and Siberian ports to the north. The St. George Basin-Outer 
Bristol Bay area is beyond the central range of the bowhead. 

Given our present state of knowledge, the Outer Bristol Bay- 
St. George Basin OCS areas east of long. 170°W and south of 
lat. 59°N do not include important or traditional habitat for 
the bowhead whale. If during those years when ice extends to 
its maximum southern limit (similar to 1976) and if unusual ice 
or storm conditions force the whales to move farther southeast 
than normal, then some whales are likely to occur here. 


Navarin Basin 


Townsend’s (1935) review of bowheads taken in the Bering 
Sea clearly indicated that they formerly frequented the Navarin 
Basin (St. Matthew Island to Cape Navarin along the conti- 
nental shelf break) from April to July (Fig. 2). Under NOAA’s 
Platforms of Opportunity Project we have received a few 
observations of bowheads throughout the Bering Sea and, 
although some effort has been expended near the Navarin 
Basin, we have received no bowhead sightings from the area. 
Several U.S. and Soviet aerial surveys have been conducted 
during the spring in or near the area but no bowheads were 
reported (Fedoseev 1966; Kenyon 1972?'; G. Fedoseev and V. 
Golt’sev’’). 

A recent icebreaker survey of bowhead winter distribution 
(Braham et al. 1980c), indicated that bowheads spend the late 
winter and early spring months in and adjacent to the Navarin 
Basin. We made a systematic survey of the ice front in March 
1979 from approximately 50 km east of Cape Navarin to south 


*’*Kenyon, K. 1972. Aerial surveys of marine mammals in the Bering Sea, 6-16 
April 1972. Unpubl. rep., 79 p. Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. 
Sery., NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115. 

*G,. Fedoseev and V. Golt’sev, TINRO, Magadan, U.S.S.R., pers. commun. 
12 September 1977. 


23 


of St. Matthew Island. Bowheads were observed in highest 
densities on the west side of St. Matthew, as well as farther 
north of St. Matthew Island, and west and southwest of St. 
Lawrence Island (Fig. 29). Weather prohibited extensive cov- 
erage of the Navarin Basin. 

No bowheads were seen between St. Lawrence and St. Mat- 
thew Islands in 1976 and 1977 but 109 animals were seen in 
1979. During years of more extensive ice coverage bowheads 
presumably occur farther south. Under these circumstances 
they are likely to occur in and adjacent to the Navarin Basin in 
greater numbers than we have seen. (Note: The Navarin Basin 
was not surveyed in 1976 and 1977.) The frequency of occur- 
rence and time spent by bowheads near Navarin, then, is prob- 
ably related to ice conditions. 


Norton Sound-Northern Bering Sea 


The Norton Sound-northern Bering Sea (NBS) OCS lease 
area, as it is presently designated to include St. Lawrence Is- 
land and the eastern half of the northern Bering Sea from the 
USA-USSR 1867 Convention Line to the Bering Strait at Cape 
Prince of Wales, includes both important habitat for bow- 
heads and areas where they do not normally occur. Bowheads 
have not, prior to spring 1980, been reported east of long. 
166°W into Norton Sound. West of long. 166°W bowheads 
occur seasonally (Table 3). 

The best available data indicate that the bowhead popula- 
tion is found in the NBS during the spring, from late March 
through May, and in the fall from November through Janu- 
ary. They might be present in low numbers near the Bering 
Strait from July to October, especially in September and Octo- 
ber; however, Eskimo informants at Little Diomede and St. 
Lawrence Islands have told us (Braham et al. 1980d) that bow- 
heads are essentially absent in the NBS during the summer 
(late June-October). An adult with calf was seen in July several 
years ago, and two adult bowheads were reported near Punuk 
Island (southeast of Northeast Point, St. Lawrence Island) in 
June or July 1978, however this is an unusual occurrence.** 

The bowhead whale spring migration around St. Lawrence 
Island may be more complex than reported by us earlier (foot- 
note 2). Bowheads apparently converge on the island from the 
south exhibiting three general patterns: Two routes around the 
west end of the island and one around the east end. Many 
Eskimos at Gambell and Savoonga report that whales that 
reach the island near Southeast Cape move west along the 
south coast and then north past the west end of the island near 
Gambell. Whales that arrive at the island at Southwest Cape 
are said to migrate west away from the island across the 
Anadyr Strait to the Siberian coast at Cape Chukotskii (lat. 
64°1S'N, long. 173°W) and the village of Siriniki before con- 
tinuing north on migration. This suggests that there are two 
migration routes around the west end of St. Lawrence Island. 
Data collected since 1976 on the occurrence and movements of 
bowheads adjacent to St. Lawrence Island did not confirm this 
hypothesis, primarily because few sightings were made. In 
1979 bowheads were seen all across the Strait of Anadyr (Bra- 
ham et al. 1980c); however, mild ice conditions may have 
altered the migration pattern as described above. 


**R. Silook, Gambell, Alaska, pers. commun. from another, unidentified 
Eskimo from Savoonga, 16 August 1979. 


Table 3.—Area use and timetable for the majority of the bowhead whale population in or adjacent to 
proposed Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lease areas of the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. 


Some exceptions exist, of course. 


ies Temporal use Spatial use 
lease 
areas Present Absent Present Absent 
St. George Basin- Essentially absent, a few may west-central Remaining? 
outer Bristol Bay occur irregularly in the spring St. George Basin 
in the western side 
Navarin Basin Feb.-Apr. May-Jan. Unknown Unknown 
Norton Sound- Mar.-June, ebe. Western half Norton 
No. Bering Sea Oct.-Jan. July-Sept. Sound? 
Hope Basin Apr.-June, Jan.-Mar., West of long. Kotzebue 
(Chukchi Sea) Sept.-Dec. July-Aug. 164° W Sound? 
Beaufort Sea Apr.-June, Dec.-Mar. Nearshore and 
Aug.-Nov. July? offshore 


‘If and when present. 
*During most years. 
‘East of long. 164° W. 


The migration route along the west side of St. Lawrence 
Island then takes the whales through the western portion of the 
NBS OCS lease area west of an imaginary line from Savoonga 
to Cape Prince of Wales. Whales in spring are on occasion 
seen In open water east of Gambell to west of Savoonga (closer 
to Gambell). Open water increases from east to west towards 
the Chukotka Peninsula. We conclude that most bowheads 
migrate through the western half of the NBS OCS lease area in 
the spring, during average ice years. Eskimos also report that 
some bowheads migrate around the east end of St. Lawrence 
Island in the spring. We have only two'sightings at the east end 
of the island since 1976. We do not believe that the east end of 
the island is an important migration corridor. A more detailed 
description of the spring migration is covered in Braham et al. 
(1980b). 

No records were found nor sightings made by us prior to 
1980 of bowheads in the eastern portion (east of long. 166°W) 
of the NBS OCS lease area (i.e., Norton Sound). More than 10 
bowheads were observed in Norton Sound in May 1980; at 
least 5 were seen near Norton Bay. These animals occurred 
here as a result of an ice blockage in the Bering Strait which 
halted their spring migration. Although a complete account of 
the number and location of bowheads in Norton Sound during 
the spring of 1980 was not available for this revised report, 
Johnson et al. (1981) summarized the causes for the delayed 
migration. The important point here is that, given the proper 
conditions, bowheads can be found throughout the NBS OCS 
lease area but in low numbers in Norton Sound. 

The autumn migration pattern in the NBS is less clear than 
for the spring, but apparently bowheads can be seen across the 
north side of St. Lawrence Island, suggesting that the migra- 
tion path in autumn may be more diffuse than in spring. Sev- 
eral Eskimos at St. Lawrence Island have told us that bow- 
heads do not migrate around the east end of the island in the 
autumn but rather move by the west end. 

The waters adjacent to St. Lawrence Island are important to 
the survival of this population. The Bering Strait is also impor- 
tant because the entire bowhead population passes through it 
twice annually. The autumn period in the Bering Strait may be 
more important than the spring because if bowheads were 
limited or restricted from entering the Chukchi and Beaufort 
Seas in the spring, they would still be able to feed throughout 


24 


the summer in the ice-free waters of the northern Bering Sea. 
Townsend (1935) clearly showed that bowheads once occurred 
in the NBS in the summer, a period thought to be a traditional 
feeding time for the species. However, if restricted from mov- 
ing into the Bering Sea in autumn, some, if not many bow- 
heads might be trapped by winter freezeup. 

In conclusion the following points can be made from our in- 
vestigations: 1) In spring, bowheads are more likely to migrate 
through the western portion of the NBS OCS lease area than 
to the east. 2) The autumn-winter migration in the NBS prob- 
ably occurs throughout most of the western NBS, but no in- 
formation exists to help us predict how far east into outer Nor- 
ton Sound they occur. 3) Inner Norton Sound (east of long. 
166°W) is seldom used by bowhead whales, and does not in- 
clude important habitat. 4) Waters adjacent to St. Lawrence 
Island and the Bering Strait may be critical habitat areas for 
the stability and survival of this population. 


Hope Basin and Northeastern Chukchi Sea 


Very little is known of the specific movements of bowheads 
in the Hope Basin (south of lat. 69°N, east of long. 169°W) 
and northeastern Chukchi Sea (north of lat. 69°N, east of 
long. 160°W). From April to June, bowheads migrate north in 
leads through the pack ice flaw zone from the Bering Strait to 
an area stretching from Kivalina out to, on some occasions, 90 
km offshore Point Hope. For additional specific details, see 
Braham et al. (1980b) and Johnson et al. (1981). 

The autumn migration through the northern Chukchi Sea 
and Hope Basin to the Bering Sea appears to be farther off- 
shore than during the spring. Bowheads are not known to fre- 
quent Kotzebue Sound (east of long. 164°W) with any regu- 
larity. Townsend’s (1935) plots of harvested whales (Fig. 2) in- 
dicated that the western portion of the Hope Basin was more 
heavily exploited, presumably a reflection of bowhead distri- 
bution. We believe that bowheads are generally found west of 
this lease area during autumn (September-November) (Braham 
et al. 1980c; Dahlheim et al. 1980; Johnson et al. 1981). 

In conclusion, bowheads frequent the Hope Basin and 
northeastern Chukchi Sea during the spring and autumn 
migration but do not appear to spend a significant portion of 
lime there for purposes of reproduction, growth, or feeding. 


The entire population migrates through the lease area from 
April to June and are found primarily west of the lease area 
from September to December. 

The northeastern Chukchi Sea is important for both spring 
and autumn migration, nearshore in the spring, and less so 
during autumn. Bowheads probably feed in the northeastern 
Chukchi Sea during autumn, most likely from September to 
December. If some bowheads do not migrate into the Beaufort 
Sea during the spring, then it seems likely that some whales oc- 
cur west and perhaps southwest of Point Barrow from late 
summer on, especially during years of heavy ice. 


Beaufort Sea 


For an assessment of the occurrence of bowheads in or adja- 
cent to existing or anticipated OCS lease areas in the Beaufort 
Sea, we consider the Beaufort Sea east of long. 150°W first, 
then west to approximately Point Barrow. This was done 
because 1) of the high probability that the western Beaufort 
Sea will soon be considered for OCS leasing, and 2) we have 
more site specific information on bowheads west of long. 
150°W than east. 


East of Longitude 150°W 


The fact that few sightings (5) were made of bowheads with- 
in or adjacent to the existing OCS lease area (approximately 
between Colville River and Flaxman Island) between 1974 and 
1978 makes it extremely difficult to determine what effects oil 
and gas development may have on the population (Table 4). 
Since 1974 we have made, or obtained, 53 fall sightings total- 
ing approximately 323 animals for the entire Beaufort Sea 
(Fig. 30). Only about 23% (a total of 15 animals) were made 
east of long. 150°W. The paucity of sightings is directly pro- 
portional to effort: We were not able to conduct extensive sur- 
veys east of long. 150°W because of poor flying weather. 


Table 4.—Sightings of bowhead whales within and adjacent to the existing Beau- 
fort Sea Outer Continental Shelf lease area between long. 150° and 145° W within 
the 12 m depth contour. Data compiled from aerial surveys conducted between 
1974 and 1978. Positions are approximate. 


No.of Latitude Longitude Information 
Date Time animals (N) (W) source 
21 Sept. 1974 1528 I(t)! 70° 13’ 146° 39’ NMFS 
12 Sept. 1975 1130 1 70° 16’ 147°21’ NMFS 
2 Aug. 1977 2300 1(t)' 70°35’ 150°00' S. R. Johnson? 
21 Sept. 1977 1243 1 70° 30' 149°00' NMFS 
21 Sept. 1977 1442 1 70° 20' 146° 20’ NMFS 


(t) = tentative. 
*LGL, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pers. commun. 20 September 1977. 


Results nevertheless indicate that bowheads do visit the OCS 
lease area, as 38% of our sightings east of long. 150°W were 
within or adjacent to the barrier islands between long. 145° 
and 150°W (Fig. 30). Other evidence exists for the occurrence 
of bowheads in the OCS lease area. In autumn 1921 Sara 
Kunaknana’s (Kaktovik, Barter Island, Alaska) family took a 
whale on Cross Island; and in 1935 they took another whale in 
the ‘‘Prudhoe Bay area.’’** A whale was also taken near the 


™G_ Jarrell, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, pers. commun. 15 
October 1978. 


25 


east fork of the Canning River (east edge of OCS lease area) in 
the fall of 1973. 

Commercial whalers frequently followed bowheads during 
the late summer and autumn months from the western Cana- 
dian Beaufort Sea to the Chukchi Sea, yet few whales were 
taken near the OCS lease area (Fig. 2). This may have been 
because 1) few whales were present, 2) whales occurred in 
areas where the whalers could not go (e.g., in shallow waters), 
3) the whales moved swiftly through the area and thus were 
difficult for the whalers to catch, and/or 4) whales occurred 
farther offshore near or in the pack ice. The net result is that 
we simply do not know how important the Beaufort Sea OCS 
lease area is to the bowhead whale. However, if they are pres- 
ent in any significant numbers, then they probably occur from 
late August to mid-October. Unfortunately, we have very little 
data to verify the precise timing and magnitude of their move- 
ments. Recent sightings of bowheads in and adjacent to this 
lease site by Ljungblad (1981) confirm that at least some bow- 
heads frequent the nearshore environs in the eastern and cen- 
tral Beaufort Sea in autumn. We do know a few bowheads 
have been sighted or taken by Eskimos in the OCS area in the 
past SO yr. 

Eskimo whalers at Kaktovik, Barter Island, hunt bowheads 
as the whales head west on their autumn migration. They in- 
form us that the autumn migration is segregated roughly into 
age classes. Smaller whales pass by early in the autumn and 
larger whales, including cow-calf pairs, pass by later. Whales 
are often first seen by late August, and later are seen near the 
pack ice as the ice moves closer to shore in September and 
October. The earliest whale taken in memory by Kaktovik 
Eskimos was 21 August 1972. Bowheads are still going by 
Barter Island as late as the whalers can get out in their boats 
and are seen even when the sea is covered with slush ice as 
late as mid-October. 


West of Longitude 150°W 


Bowheads apparently frequent the inshore waters of the 
Beaufort Sea between Point Barrow and Smith Bay on an an- 
nual basis (Figs. 24, 25, 30). Though we have spent more time 
flying offshore (out to 225 km) than nearshore west of long. 
150°W, most animals were sighted within only a few kilome- 
ters of the coast. Most were seen in September (over 90%), but 
sightings made in August (Fig. 22; A. Brower, Sr.**), and one 
in November’® point out that the time of occurrence here, as 
well as east of long. 150°W, covers a longer period than we 
previously thought (Table 2). Again, the timing of migration 
and occurrence undoubtedly varies somewhat among years. 

We observed bowheads feeding east of Point Barrow to 
Smith Bay during September 1976. The whales were observed 
in shallow water, adjacent to the Plover Islands (Fig. 24). 
The same occurrence and behavior was observed in 1974,°’ 
1975 (Ray in Braham and Krogman footnote 2), and 1978 
(Braham et al. 1980d) (Fig. 30). On 21 September 1976, R. 


8A. Brower, Sr., Barrow, Alaska, pers. commun. 20 December 1977. 

36J. Burns, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fairbanks, Alaska, pers. 
commun. 20 December 1977. 

7C, Fiscus, Natl. Mar. Mammal Lab., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., NOAA, 7600 
Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 32, Seattle, WA 98115, pers. commun. 28 Septem- 
ber 1976. 


Everitt (NMML, Seattle) photographed three whales lying at 
the surface with their mouths wide open at right angles to the 
wind and tide. If they were feeding, and we believe they were 
as this incident coincided with a large bloom and onshore 
movement of euphausiids, then this is the first known case of 
a whale passively feeding. 

Eskimo whalers hunt for whales west of long. 150°W. 
Four whales were taken in the channel between Tapkaluk 
and Cooper Islands (lat. 71°51'N, long. 155°40'W) 29 Sep- 
tember-8 October 1974. Whether the nearshore waters west 
of long. 150°W are more important to this population than 
east of long. 150°W has not been determined, but we believe 
that they are. 

Bowheads have been seen in the autumn in shallow water 
of 3-12 m deep in the U.S. Beaufort Sea (Fig. 30, and Fraker 
and Bockstoce 1980). Bodfish (1936) found bowheads consis- 
tently at water depths < 40 m, but not deeper. Between 
August and November 1974-78, we have scored 234 sightings 
of bowheads in the Beaufort and eastern Chukchi Seas near 
Point Barrow: 172 were in water < 12 m deep, and 62 in 
water > 12 m (Fig. 30). The 12 m contour east of Point Bar- 
row averages < 5 km offshore and 2 km off the Plover 
Islands. More of our aerial survey effort was conducted off- 
shore near the 12 m contour rather than nearer to shore. The 
nearshore waters here appear to be more important for feed- 
ing whales than are waters further offshore. 


A Question of Species Identity: Bowhead, 
Ingutuk, Right Whale? 


During spring 1978 a controversy developed over whether 
two species of right whale (of the genus Balaena = Eubalaena) 
were present during the bowhead whale migration along the 
northwest coast of Alaska. Discussion at that time centered 
around the belief that a small, early spring ‘‘Arctic ice whale,” 
called ingutuk, was the Pacific right whale, Ba/aena glacialis, 
rather than the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus. This led 
to the further concern that two endangered right whales, as 
well as the California stock of gray whales, Eschrichtius ro- 
bustus, seasonally frequent the Beaufort Sea OCS lease area. 
The following evidence may resolve the issue (discussed in 
detail in Braham et al. 1980a). 


Historical Evidence 
Nomenclature 


The question of taxonomic placement of the ingutuk is not 
new: Hadley (1915), Brower (1942), and Jim Allen in Bailey 
and Hendee (1926) thought ingutuks were not the same species 
as bowheads. The term inguftuwk, an Eskimo word thought to 
refer specifically to young, fat, perhaps female, bowheads, Is 
one of several terms commonly used to describe differing age 
and/or size categories of agvik—the bowhead whale. The term 
ingutuvuk (‘“‘one who carries a calf’’) describes a large female; 
usingwachaek is a full-sized bowhead; kairalik, kivralivuk, 
and kiyralivoak refer to different sizes of male bowheads** 


**<Eskimo whaling at Barrow,’ an anonymously authored manuscript dated 
12 December 1972, “*compiled by the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory, Bar- 
row, Alaska, for use by Dr. Floyd Durham.” 


(Durham footnote 10; Rice 1977; A. Brower, Sr. footnote 25). 
The profusion of terms describing these whales appears to be 
based upon historic and cultural usage. 


Geographic Isolation 


Bowheads now in the western Arctic-Bering Sea stock may 
be isolated from the Atlantic and/or Okhotsk stocks, and 
morphologically differences among stocks may explain the ex- 
istence of the ingutuk. Townsend’s (1935) and Bockstoce and 
Botkin’s (footnote 13) harvest records indicate that while the 
Okhotsk and western Arctic-Bering Sea stocks are now iso- 
lated, this may not have been so > 100 yr ago. This would not 
seem enough time for genetic-morphological changes to occur. 
No diagnostic differences have been described between Atlan- 
tic and Pacific stocks (Scoresby 1820; Eschricht and Reinhardt 
1866; Scammon 1874), and although detailed recent morpho- 
logical data are not available for comparison among stocks, 
geographic isolation leading to new morphological types reen- 
tering the population cannot be ruled out. 


Biological Evidence 
Morphological Features 


Some 22 morphological and behavioral features have been 
used to describe the differences between bowheads and ingu- 
tuks. After evaluating these characters with results of our re- 
search since 1973, and using information compiled by Durham 
(footnote 10) and Foote (footnote 21), we found that 14 
(61%) of the characters were not unique to imgutuks, and 
that 4 (18%) of the characters could not be classified to 
either. Only 4 (18%) seemed to be positive ingutuk character- 
istics. These data do not exclude the possibility that the ingu- 
tuk represents one extreme of normal variation. An occa- 
sional whale with features usually attributed only to ingutuk, 
usingwachaek, or kyralik have been reported (Durham foot- 
note 10), suggesting that a range of features may occur with- 
in individuals as well as within the (bowhead) population. 


Sex and Size Categorization 


There is belief by some Alaskan Eskimos that ingutuks are 
young female bowheads. Prior to 1978 only one of many ingu- 
tuks taken since 1962 was reported to be a male; all others were 
females. Since 1978, three males have been reported. Since 
1973 we have identified 14 ingutuks out of 112 bowheads taken 
at Point Hope and Barrow. Ten of the ingutuks were female, 3 
were males, and | was not satisfactorily sexed. The sex ratio of 
non-ingutuk bowheads from 1973 to 1978 was 46 females to 
53 males. Significantly fewer male than female ingutuks have 
been taken, suggesting that ‘‘ingutuk’’ may be a female sex- 
related trait or term. Jngutuks have been reported to be 
smaller than bowheads; however, we found no significant 
difference. This test included all size classes of usingwachaek 
(= kiyralik), ingutuk, and ingutuvuk (= large ingutuk?). 


Genetic-Biochemical Studies 


We conducted biochemical and genetic studies on bowheads 
taken from 1977 to 1979 to help clarify stock discreteness. 
Electrophoretic analyses of liver tissues (nine whales) and 
blood proteins (three whales), including one ingutuk in each 
analysis, showed that much variability occurs within the popu- 
lation and within at least one individual analyzed. The bio- 
chemically variant animal, however, did not possess morpho- 
logical characteristics attributed to inguruk. Conversely, the 
ingutuk samples were not distinguishable from the other bow- 
heads. 


Conclusion 


It is apparent that some bowhead whales look different 
from others, even though it often takes an experienced observer 
to make the distinction. The most apparent differences seem to 
occur with the variant called ingutuk. The preponderance of 
direct and circumstantial evidence suggests, however, that a 
clear distinction between ingutuk and bowhead cannot always 
be made when considering all morphological features over a 
range of whale sizes. 

Although detailed morphometric and genetic-biochemical 
analyses of bowhead whales are far from complete, our re- 
search to date leads us to conclude that the ingutuk is not a 
species separate from the bowhead. The ingutuk is likely an 
age and/or sex related trait with the most compelling ex- 
planation that it is a yearling. 


White Whales in Alaska 
Abundance and Distribution 


White whales of the northeastern North Pacific Ocean occur 
from the Gulf of Alaska westward to the Bering Sea, north- 
ward through the Chukchi Sea, eastward into the Beaufort Sea 
(Klinkhart 1966; Scheffer 1972), and west into the East Sibe- 
rian Sea (Kleinenberg et al. 1964). 

The Gulf of Alaska population of stock,*’ an estimated 
300-500 animals, appears to remain in or near Cook Inlet year- 
round (Brooks 1963; Klinkhart 1966; Scheffer 1972; Alaska 
Department of Fish and Game 1975*°; Harrison and Hall 
1978). Murray and Fay (1979)*' found few animals present 
during the winter months. 

White whale sightings have been made, however, in the 
Gulf of Alaska beyond the boundaries of Cook Inlet. Harri- 
son and Hall (1978) document the sighting of a single animal 
in Prince William Sound in March, and near Kodiak Island 
in March and July. Calkins and Pitcher (1977)*? reported a 
late May sighting of 21 white whales in Yakutat Bay. They 
have been sighted as far south as Washington State (Scheffer 


***Stock,’’ as defined here, is a geographic subunit of a larger interbreeding 
population. 

“Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 1975. [Untitled.] Unpubl. manuscr., 
8 p. Alaska Dep. Fish Game, Juneau, Alaska. 

“Murray, N. K., and F. H. Fay. 1979. The white whales or belukhas, Del- 
phinapterus leucas, of Cook Inlet, Alaska. Unpubl. manuscr., 6 p. Coll. Environ. 
Sci., Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99701. 

“Calkins, D., and K. Pitcher. 1977. Unusual sightings of marine mammals in 
the Gulf of Alaska. [Abstr.] Jn Proc. Second Conf. Biol. Mar. Mammals, San 
Diego, Calif., 12-15 Dec., 1977, p. 53. 


27 


and Slipp 1948), although this is certainly beyond their nor- 
mal range. The population in Cook Inlet and the Gulf of 
Alaska is believed to be local and separate from Bristol Bay 
and’ Bering Sea population(s). Even though the Alaska 
Peninsula is evidently a barrier to the movement of these 
animals from the Gulf of Alaska into the Bering Sea, it 
seems plausible that interbreeding occurred in the recent 
past. 

White whales occurring in the Bering Sea compose resident 
(or at least local to a defined area) and migratory groups. A 
minimum of 1,000-1,500 has been estimated to occur in the 
Bristol Bay-Kuskokwim Bay area throughout the year (Alas- 
ka Department of Fish and Game 1957 footnote 40; Klink- 
hart 1966). An additional, but unknown, number are thought 
to winter in the Bering Sea north of Bristol Bay. These ani- 
mals apparently migrate into eastern Siberian and western 
Canadian waters in late spring and summer (Alaska Depart- 
ment of Fisheries 1955, 1956; Kleinenberg et al. 1964; Ser- 
geant and Hoek 1974; Braham and Krogman footnote 2; 
Fraker footnote 23). An unknown portion of these migratory 
animals summer in the Norton Sound-Yukon Delta area (Figs. 
20, 32), while others continue north through the Bering Strait 
(Scheffer 1972; Fay 1974). 

White whales in the Chukchi Sea seem to be largely tran- 
sients. Most migrate between the Bering and Chukchi Seas. 
An unknown number summer in Kotzebue Sound, particu- 


° f 1) | £ LL We 
Chukchi Sea {yg i, Beaufort 
lias al Sea 
4H 
7 e 
ne as 
po 
||| C 
SSL hie ean 
Bering Sea ) ae 
LH Loe Fe ‘aye 
jee wy. Alaska Ed Le 
Ea peel 1 
L s 52 
“EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEE EEE | > 
174 Les eZ 14] 


Figure 32.—Sightings of white whales during aerial surveys conducted between 
the months of March and September 1975-77. Over 400 sightings were made of 
approximately 2,000 whales. 


larly in Eschscholtz and Spafarief Bays, and others along the 
northwest coast. White whales have been reported in the 
southern Chukchi Sea in February,*? which may mean that 
some overwinter in the Chukchi Sea as well as the Bering 
Sea. 

The Beaufort Sea probably serves mainly as a summer 
feeding area for white whales migrating from the Bering and 
Chukchi Seas. Overwintering in the Beaufort and Chukchi 
Seas, should it occur (Bailey and Hendee 1926), would most 
likely be associated with the occurrence of some open water 
during mild ice years. 

The Bering Sea population of white whales in 1976 ex- 
ceeded 9,000. Some 6,000 migrants from U.S. waters were 
estimated in the Canadian Beaufort Sea (Fraker footnote 23; 
Fraker et al. 1978) at the same time that perhaps 3,000 ani- 
mals were estimated in U.S. waters along the northwest coast 
of Alaska (Point Lay to Wainwright), Kotzebue Sound, Nor- 
ton Sound, and Bristol Bay.** J. Burns (footnote 44) esti- 
mated the Alaska population size of white whales to be near 
16,000 individuals. 


Migration 


The spring and summer migration route of white whales in 
the eastern North Pacific follows inshore and offshore leads in 
the pack ice along the west and north coasts of Alaska, through 
the Bering and Chukchi Seas, and corresponds closely to the 
bowhead migration (Braham and Krogman footnote 2). Klein- 
enberg et al. (1964) suggested that as the migrating animals 
move through the Bering Strait, some continue along the north 
coast of the Chukotka Peninsula. The bulk of the population 
follows open leads east to Banks Island in Canada’s Northwest 
Territories (Braham and Krogman footnote 2; Fraker footnote 
23; Fraker et al. 1978). What percentage of the Alaskan popu- 
lation(s) is represented in the western Chukchi and Beaufort 
Seas is unknown, as is our knowledge of how many white 
whales from the Soviet Union join those in United States 
waters to migrate into Canadian waters each spring. 

Spring migration occurs from March to early July, when 
white whales follow leads along the flaw zone throughout the 
pack ice, using offshore and nearshore leads. Moving north, 
white whales leave the Bering Sea in March and April (Bailey 
and Hendee 1926; Kleinenberg et al. !964; Johnson et al. 
1966; Braham and Krogman footnote 2). Those summering 
in Canadian Arctic waters pass through the Chukchi Sea in 
middle to late April (Fiscus and Marquette footnote 18; Bra- 
ham and Krogman footnote 2) and cross the Beaufort Sea 
from May to June (Sergeant and Hoek 1974; Fraker footnote 
23). Braham and Krogman (footnote 2), Fraker et al. (1978), 
and Braham et al. (1979) proposed that the eastbound mi- 
grants follow the 30-100 km offshore (varying annually) open 
lead system northeast to Banks Island, Northwest Territories, 
Canada. The animals then move south along the west side of 
Banks Island to Amundsen Gulf and on to the Mackenzie 
Delta (Fraker footnote 23). Whether they migrate directly to 
Banks Island or to Amundsen Gulf consistently each year 


“C. Ray, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md., pers. commun. 20 April 


1976. 
**J. Burns, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fairbanks, Alaska, pers. 


commun. 7 November 1977. 


i) 
oo 


probably depends on ice conditions. The earliest recorded 
sightings of white whales near Banks Island were made in 
mid-May (Stefansson 1943; Fraker et al. 1978; Braham et al. 
1979); however, two bowheads were sighted on 8 May 1978, 
near the northwest tip of Banks Island (Braham et al. 1979), 
\iggesting that white whales may reach Banks Island even 
before May. R. Goose**S saw 10 white whales off Holman 
Island in late April 1979, earlier than in most years (1979 was 
an unusual ice year because breakup was | wk-1 mo earlier 
than expected). Our preliminary results indicate that some 
white whales precede bowheads in their northward migration 
by perhaps 1-2 wk, but again, this may vary among years. 

The timing of the autumn migration west from Canada to 
United States and Soviet waters is not well documented. De- 
parture from the Canadian Beaufort Sea commences in Au- 
gust and September (Sergeant and Hoek 1974; Fraker et al. 
1978) with passage into the Bering Sea in December (Burgess 
1973) or during the time of advancing ice. White whales 
begin to appear regularly near St. Lawrence Island in the 
Bering Sea from November to January and, on occasion, as 
early as September and October as do some bowheads.*® 
Though scant information is available on the autumn migra- 
tion, Fraker et al. (1978) believed that those white whales 
summering in Canadian waters return to the Bering Sea, and 
that few, if any, move east into the eastern Canadian high 
Arctic. 


Identity of Stocks 


From aerial surveys of the Bering Sea and western Arctic 
Ocean since 1976, a composite of white whale sightings was 
made (Fig. 31). In March and April white whales were seen 
moving from the west central Bering Sea along the east coast 
of Siberia and north along the northwest coast of Alaska. The 
movements of the whales was directional—north. It is not until 
May and June, when the pack ice breaks up along the coast, 
that we began seeing white whales in areas where they appear 
to summer: The northwest coast from Point Lay to Point Bar- 
row, Kotzebue Sound, and Norton Sound. Sightings of white 
whales in Bristol Bay in April, May, and June indicate that 
these animals may be resident, or return to Bristol Bay after 
having moved south with the advancing ice in the winter. 

Animals observed in Bristol Bay, Norton Sound, or Kotze- 
bue Sound during the summer may be either 1) late migrants 
of a single Bering Sea population that remain in the shallow 
waters or 2) stocks of an Alaskan and/or Soviet population. 
It seems improbable that any major isolation would take 
place, because there are no isolating barriers except, perhaps, 
the pack ice; however, this is only seasonal. Except in 1977 
and 1978, very few white whales have been seen along the 
northwest coast of Alaska offshore during the summer; some 
isolation between components of the Bering Sea population 
thus occurs from May to November. Little work has been 
conducted during the summer in the U.S. Arctic Ocean. If 
those whales observed in the southern and east central areas 
of the Bering Sea were to intermix with the main body of the 
population to the north, then they could do so for 4 mo, 


*SR. Goose, Holman Island, Northwest Territory, Canada, pers. commun. 23 
May 1979. 
**—D. Harry, Gambell, Alaska, pers. commun. 25 July 1978. 


January through April. Without knowing the rate of ex- 
change or the frequency of intermixing among years, it is 
impossible to evaluate whether we are dealing with one, two, 
or perhaps as many as four breeding stocks of white whales 
in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. White whales which are har- 
vested by Alaska Eskimos in summer, as in Kotzebue Sound 
anaG adjacent bays, as well as those along the northwest coast 
probably should be considered management stocks because 
of the timing of harvest occurring simultaneously with repro- 
duction. 


Life History and Associated Information 
Reproduction 


The average age at sexual maturity for female white whales 
in eastern Canadian Arctic waters has been reported to be 5 yr, 
at 270 cm long or 85% full adult length (Doan and Douglas 
1953; Brodie 1971; Sergeant 1973). Males, on the average, 
were reported by Brodie (1971) and Sergeant (1973) to be sex- 
ually mature at 8 yr of age. Kleinenberg et al. (1964) found 
that female white whales in the eastern Siberian Arctic at- 
tained sexual maturity at an average age of 3 yr, at 247-470 
cm in length, compared with 2-3 yr and 380-450 cm for males 
(Dorofeev and Klumoy 1936). Disagreement in calculated age 
at sexual maturity between the Soviet and Canadian data 
may be due to the poor state of knowledge concerning ageing 
methodology at the time of the earlier studies. 

Calving and mating apparently occur simultaneously from 
May through August in eastern Siberian and Canadian 
waters (Vladykov 1944; Laws 1959; Sergeant 1962, 1973; 
Kleinenberg et al. 1964; Brodie 1971; Nishiwaki 1972). Simi- 
larly, Belkovich (1960) found that in the Soviet Arctic (White 
to Kara Seas) calving occurred from mid-June to mid-July, 
later to the east. Calving in Alaska is believed to commence 
in May or June (Klinkhart 1966); however, young calves are 
commonly seen by coastal Eskimo residents as early as 
March. Young of the year and neonatal calves have been 
seen in April and May each of the 4 yr we have been studying 
bowheads along the northwest coast of Alaska (Braham et al. 
1979, 1980c). Small young of the year calves were observed 
by the senior author 100 km north of Barrow on 28 Septem- 
ber 1979. Calving may therefore occur into late summer or 
early autumn. Mating locations in the eastern Bering Sea are 
southeast Kotzebue Sound, Bristol Bay, Yukon Delta-Norton 
Sound, and along the northwest coast of Alaska, particularly 
near Peard Bay. 

White whales are reported to give birth nearshore to single 
calves averaging 150 cm in length (Doan and Douglas 1953; 
Sergeant 1962; Kleinenberg et al. 1964). Newborn calves have 
been observed in river estuaries of the eastern Canadian Arc- 
tic (Brodie 1969; Sergeant 1973) and western Canadian Arc- 
tic, specifically, the Mackenzie River estuary (Sergeant and 
Hoek 1974). 

Cows are believed to nurse calves for approximately 24 
mo. Brodie (1971) and Sergeant (1973) estimated lactation 
periods of 24 mo and 21 mo, respectively, for white whales in 
eastern Canadian Arctic waters. Kleinenberg et al. (1964) 
estimated the lactation period in Siberian Arctic waters to be 
5-6 mo. 

Given a gestation period of approximately 12-15 mo (Vlad- 
ykov 1944; Belkovich 1960; Kleinenberg et al. 1964; Brodie 


29 


1971; Nishiwaki 1972; Sergeant 1973) and no more than a 2- 
yr lactation, and assuming a cow nurses one calf at a time, 
the reproductive cycle for white whales could last up to 3 yr. 
Female white whales have been reported to mate on the aver- 
age once every 2-3 yr (Degerboel and Freuchen 1935; Brodie 
1971; Sergeant 1973). 


Food Habits 


White whales feed on fish, mainly, and invertebrates in estu- 
aries, small streams, and rivers and in bays near the mouths of 
rivers and on occasion, considerable distances up rivers. In 
these areas they feed midwater to the bottom on organisms sel- 
dom found deeper than 50 fathoms (Doan and Douglas 1953; 
Sergeant 1962, 1968; Kleinenberg et al. 1964). 

Prey consumed in the eastern Canadian Arctic (Vladykov 
1946; Doan and Douglas 1953; Sergeant 1973) and Siberian 
Arctic (Kleinenberg et al. 1964) are more thoroughly docu- 
mented than in the western Canadian and Alaskan Arctic. 
For the Hudson Bay-Churchill region Sergeant (1968) re- 
ported that the most common species of fish consumed by 
white whales was capelin, which spawns in shallow water 
close to river mouths, July-August. River fish, ciscos and 
pike, marine worms, and squid are also taken. In Hudson 
Bay’s Whale Cove area, where capelin do not occur, white 
whales forage primarily on decapod shrimp (bottom dwellers), 
Arctic char, Greenland cod, and polar cod. 

Sergeant and Hoek (1974) reported that prey taken by 
white whales in offshore areas of the Beaufort Sea in de- 
creasing order of importance were squid, fish, and crustacea. 
The fish included lake herring and possibly Pacific herring. 
Fraker et al. (1978) reported polar cod and squid to be com- 
mon offshore species consumed by white whales in the Beau- 
fort Sea and Amundsen Gulf. Prey species taken in the U.S. 
Beaufort Sea are unknown, but Arctic cod is an abundant 
species in the western Arctic. White whales resident to Bristol 
Bay and Cook Inlet feed on five species of salmon, smelt, 
flounder, sole, sculpin, blenny, lamprey, two types of 
shrimp, and mussels, May to August (Alaska Department of 
Fisheries 1955, 1956; Alaska Department of Fish and Game 
1957). Prey taken by white whales in the coastal waters of the 
Chukchi Sea vary greatly: Saffron cod, sculpins, capelin, rain- 
bow smelt, Arctic cod, herring, whitefish, char, salmon, 
suckers, cragonid shrimp, isopods, snails, octopus, gonatid 
squid, and polychaetes (Lowry et al. 1980).*’ 


Group Composition 


Group size varies seasonally. Large pods congregate in the 
early spring until the breakup of the pack ice (Kleinenberg et 
al. 1964). Once this occurs they form smaller groups of two to 
four individuals which spread out over several kilometers until 
the summering areas are reached (Kleinenberg et al. 1964; 
Fraker footnote 24). However, larger groups have been ob- 
served in April and May during our aerial studies and at Point 
Barrow and Point Hope. In the summering areas the whales 
assemble into large congregations for feeding and/or repro- 


“Lowry, L., K. Frost, and J. Burns. 1980. Trophic relationships among ice- 
inhabiting phocid seals and functionally related marine mammals in the Chukchi 
Sea. Unpubl. final OCSEAP report, RU232, 58 p. Alaska Dep. Fish Game, 1300 
College Road, Fairbanks, AK 99701. 


ductive activities (Sergeant and Hoek 1974). Later on, due to 
the gradual dispersal of food (primary fish), Klumoy (1939) 
reported the whales divide into smaller groups and eventually 
move toward the wintering grounds. 


From a sample size of 2,002 white whales observed during 
surveys since 1976, we calculated that mean group size was 
4.8 (SD 0.43, n = 419). The preponderance of sightings oc- 
curred in April and May. The mean group size estimated is 
believed to be biased downwards because of a tendency to 
split larger ‘groups’? when counting from an_ airplane. 
Group size estimates made from our ice camps at Point Bar- 
row varied from 4.8 to 12.4 (no variance estimate) depending 
on lead width (extent of water). As open water increased, 
group size decreased. 


Kleinenberg et al. (1964) further detailed the composition 
of groups with size variation (i.e., 10’s or 100’s of individ- 
uals). In groups of 10, the animals were normally traveling 
by two’s and three’s, some 10-30 m apart. Within these 
groups of 10 they found that 1) adults always kept apart; 2) 
adults often formed the majority of the herd; and 3) the few 
young that were present remained in the middle of the larger 
group structure. In groups of 100’s, large adult males, form- 
ing 51.2% of the herd, were followed by females with calves 
(Dorofeev and Klumov 1936; Arsenyev 1939). Kleinenberg et 
al. (1964) reported that females were often accompanied by 
one to three ‘‘young’’ (presumably gray-colored subadults). 


White whales are dark brown to gray in color up to about 
6 yr old. Sexual maturity occurs at approximately 5 yr for fe- 
males and 8 yr for males (Sergeant 1973). Color change can 
thus be used to estimate the minimum size of the subadult 
population. In 1977, we scored 1,699 white whales (including 
7 newborn calves) as to color phase during their annual 
spring migration past Point Hope, Alaska. It was possible to 
make a classified count of 507 animals: 316 (62.3%) were 
white; 166 (32.7%) were gray; and 25 (4.9%) were transi- 
tional between gray and white. This resulted in an approxi- 
mate adult to subadult ratio of 2:1. From aerial surveys in 
1976 and 1977, a ratio of 14:1 (white:gray phase) was esti- 
mated. We believe the aerial results to be an overestimate 
because of the short amount of time to count and confirm 
the color of an animal from the air (for these data years 
only), and the ice counts to be an underestimate because of 
the light reflection off gray ice or dark water onto a light 
object making the object appear darker than actual. Also, we 
assume that both methods were an unbiased estimate of the 
population(s). 


RECOMMENDATIONS 
Actions Based on Existing Knowledge 


Based on our present state of knowledge of the distribu- 
tion and biology of the bowhead whale in the Bering, Chuk- 
chi, and Beaufort Seas, we recommend that serious consider- 
ation be given to removing or drastically limiting oil and gas 
development in four important (perhaps critical) habitat 
areas: 1) The northern Bering Sea around St. Lawrence Is- 
land. 2) The Bering Strait. 3) Northwest coast of Alaska, 
Cape Lisburne to Point Barrow. 4) The western U.S. Beau- 
fort Sea from long. 150° W to Point Barrow. 


30 


Designation of these areas as of primary importance to the 
species is partly based on the fact that we have better infor- 
mation for these areas than for others. Unfortunately, we 
have less good information for areas which might prove to be 
of particular importance, e.g., the eastern Beaufort Sea (in- 
cluding the present OCS lease site), Hope Basin, and the 
Navarin Basin. However, the eastern Beaufort Sea and the 
Hope Basin appear to be transition zones for the whales dur- 
ing their annual migration rather than vital places where they 
would be most vulnerable. Additional research, particularly 
in the Beaufort Sea, is needed to verify this point. 

Without precedents regarding effects on whales of oil- 
related development activities, it is difficult to assess jeopardy 
to this population, as required by Section 7 of the U.S. En- 
dangered Species Act of 1972. However, we can predict the 
times and locations where the population, or at least indi- 
viduals, would be vulnerable to an oil spill or other possible 
disturbing activities. The times are outlined by OCS lease 
area in Table 3. Specifically the above described areas are of 
greatest significance because we believe bowheads engage in 
two critical life history phases there—reproduction and feed- 
ing. They also migrate directly through these areas twice 
annually. 

Our conclusions are based on 2 yr of OCSEAP research, 
and two additional years of NMFS studies where, in both 
cases, we were limited by weather, time, and budget to com- 
pletely cover all areas visited by bowheads. It is, of course, 
difficult to draw conclusions on the importance of areas and 
times within their range where few data exist. 

We are less certain about the times and areas where white 
whales might be vulnerable. Certainly inner Kotzebue Sound 
appears to be an important summering area for reproduction 
and feeding. The northwest coastal waters from Point Lay to 
Point Barrow appear also to be an important area for white 
whales, although this may vary among years. But again, be- 
cause we do not know how many stocks of white whales we 
are dealing with, site specific vulnerability is particularly dif- 
ficult to assess. 

White whales appear to occur farther offshore in the U.S. 
Arctic Ocean than bowheads; perhaps they are less vulnerable 
to nearshore development. Some do, however, occur very 
near shore in the eastern Bering and Chukchi Seas during the 
spring and summer. Because some Eskimo subsistence de- 
pends upon both species, we urge that site specific studies 
related to interaction between whale, subsistence activities 
(hunting requirements), and oil development activities be 
undertaken or continued.** We further urge that ecological 
studies be conducted, placing greater value on both species 
habitat requirements and environmental (physical and bio- 
logical) interaction than previously suggested or conducted. 


“*Since this paper was written two important studies were conducted on be- 
havior and distribution of bowheads which we recommend to the reader. 1) 
Wursig, B., C. Clark, E. Dorsey, M. Fraker, and R. Payne. 1981. Normal be- 
havior of bowheads. Jn W. J. Richardson (editor), Behavior, disturbance 
responses and feeding of bowhead whales in the Beaufort Sea, 1980, p. 21-90. 
Chapter in unpublished report from LGL Ecol. Res. Assoc., Inc., Bryan, Tex., 
for U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Wash., D.C. 2) Fraker, M., C. Greene, 
and B. Wursig. 1981. Disturbance responses of bowheads and characteristics of 
waterborne noise. /n W. J. Richardson (editor), Behavior, disturbance responses 
and feeding of bowhead whales in the Beaufort Sea, 1980, p. 91-195. Chapter in 
unpublished report from LGL Ecol. Res. Assoc., Inc., Bryan, Tex., for U.S. 
Bureau of Land Management, Wash., D.C. 


Proposed Research Needs 


With regards to potential problems or questions of concern 
to the BLM, future bowhead whale research needs include 
consideration of direct and indirect effects of oil pollution 
and developmental activities with potential first-order effects, 
such as: 1) Intestinal disturbances resulting from oil inges- 
tion; 2) irritation and deterioration of skin and eye tissues; 3) 
impairment of thermal regulation; 4) fouling of baleen 
plates; 5) inhalation of oil and congestion of the lungs; 6) 
noise interference with intraspecific communications; and 7) 
threat to traditional migration routes, calving areas, and/or 
feeding grounds. The most critical second order effects 
would be destruction of food supplies through contamination 
or alteration of the marine habitat, should it occur. 

The objectives of any research in and near OCS lease areas 
should be to determine 1) the frequency of occurrence in and 
adjacent to specific lease sites; 2) the magnitude of, or com- 
poment of, the population (including sex and/or age class 
segregation) frequenting the lease areas; 3) the reasons why 
whales occur in certain areas (e.g., apparent annual feeding 
nearshore east of Point Barrow in September); and 4) the 
studies (direct and indirect) that could best address potential 
noise, oil, and traffic interference problems. Because destruc- 
tion of preferred wildlife habitat is a common result of man’s 
activities, general studies of the marine environment as it 
now exists in Alaska would be of primary importance. Pre- 
sumably these kinds of studies will continue on a lease site 
basis as lease sale scheduling proceeds from site to site. 

The following is a list of proposed research topics with 
regard to bowheads and white whales. Results from these 
studies should provide at least the minimum information 
needed to make management decisions, especially where re- 
lated to the requirements of the Endangered Species Act. 
These studies admittedly relate primarily to occurrence and 
direct effects because, we believe, these are the most obvious 
studies for which answers might be readily obtained. Most 
have been recommended previously in various meetings and 
documents since June 1978. 


Bering Sea 


1) Study whale movements and habits of whales associated 
with the movement of ice during breakup in spring and forma- 
tion in autumn around St. Lawrence Island. 

2) Study calving and feeding near St. Lawrence Island in the 
spring and feeding in the autumn, especially north of the island. 

3) Study habitat use patterns in the Navarin Basin during 
late winter. 


Chukchi Sea 


1) Determine if bowhead and white whales migrate directly 
into the western Chukchi Sea during the late spring or summer 
from the NBS, and if they migrate from the Beaufort Sea into 
the Chukchi Sea between June and September. This informa- 
tion is necessary to determine if the entire population enters 
the Beaufort Sea and, thus, might be vulnerable to oil develop- 
ment related activities along the North Slope. 

2) Ascertain whether the Hope Basin area supports bow- 
heads for feeding in late autumn. 


31 


3) Study presence of white whales in Kotzebue Sound and 
adjacent bays (e.g., Escholtz Bay) and the northwest coast to 
relate habitat use and seasonal dependency. Population seg- 
regation or stock identification might be studied using elec- 
trophoretic analyses. Life history information is essential. 

4) Determine which areas of the northeast Chukchi Sea 
that bowhead whales are most likely to feed in and migrate 
through in the autumn. 


Beaufort Sea 


1) Determine the frequency distribution of whales from the 
shore to the pack ice in the summer and autumn. It is essential 
that we know what component of the migrating population 
will be in or near the OCS area. For example, do all whales 
move offshore (i.e., near the ice edge), or nearshore through 
the lease area? A knowledge of the spatial distribution is neces- 
sary to determine how many individuals in the population 
might be vulnerable. Changes in ice conditions and relative 
movement of whales to ice is an important corollary study. 

2) Conduct aircraft and/or vessel surveys in the western 
Canadian Beaufort Sea during the summer, principally in 
Amundsen Gulf, to further determine if the relative magni- 
tude of the bowhead population here is similar to that esti- 
mated at Point Barrow in the spring. Again, this is important 
in order to assess what portion of the population might be 
vulnerable. Related behavior and feeding studies are also 
recommended. 

3) Define the importance of the U.S. Beaufort Sea for 
bowhead feeding. Food habit studies and sample collecting 
of zooplankton should be done over a wide area of the Beau- 
fort Sea. General trophic interaction studies are important 
too. This is important baseline information because we have 
no idea how, or if, animals respond to changing resource 
(prey density) patterns between the shore and pack ice, or 
even east to west in the Beaufort Sea. General biological 
oceanographic information is paramount to understand the 
Beaufort Sea ecosystem; such information is presently lack- 
ing. 


Non-site Specific Studies 


Noise effect studies should be conducted. Additional detailed 
studies on behavior and response vocalizations might also help 
determine the whales’ sensitivity to man’s activities. Further 
analysis of historical Eskimo and Yankee shore-based whaling 
records should be made to establish and to evaluate total mor- 
tality. Since the euphasiids (e.g., Thysanoessa raschit) and cope- 
pods (Calanus spp.) are the principal prey taken by bowheads, 
a detailed study of the life cycle and quantitative occurrence of 
these species should be made in the Arctic, especially in the 
Beaufort Sea nearshore from Barter Island to Point Barrow, 
Amundsen Gulf, and eastern Chukchi Sea. Naturally, the life 
histories and quantitative determination of other prey species 
and competing predators should be made as other important 
bowhead food items are discovered. Concurrent biological 
oceanographic studies should support the laboratory work. 
Oil effects studies, after life cycle studies, should follow. 

The aforementioned proposed studies are only generally 
discussed here. Specific studies should be thoroughly re- 


viewed for scientific relevance and management alternatives 
considered. Results from these, or similar studies, will pro- 
vide a preliminary basis for making timely decisions concern- 
ing further research and possible implications of OCS de- 
velopment. Additional much needed research on life history 
parameters should also be vigorously pursued. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


National Marine Mammal Laboratory personnel who con- 
tributed to our 1975-77 research were: Teresa Bray, Robert 
Everitt, Clifford Fiscus, Ed Iten, Gordon Jarrell, Willman 
Marquette, Mary Nerini, John Patee, David Rugh, Nancy 
Severinghaus, John Smithhisler, Ronald Sonntag, John 
Brueggeman, Richard Foust, Beth Hacker, Leola Hietala, 
Evelyn Magee, Bruce McAlister, Patrick McGuire, Joan 
McPhee, Keith Parker, Carl Peterson, Rick Punsly, Michael 
Tillman, and Joanne Wejak. Sam Waterman, Rae Mitsuoka, 
Roger Pearson, Ethel Zweifel, Jim Peacock, Nancy Williams- 
Nelson, and Carol Hastings of the Northwest and Alaska 
Fisheries Center, NMFS, Seattle, Wash., provided valuable 
assistance with editing, graphics, and duplication. Unknown 
referees during the publication review process are thanked 
for their assistance. 

Two Alaskan Eskimo whaling captains and their crews who 
greatly assisted us during the 1976 and 1977 spring seasons 
were Robert Aiken and Arnold Brower, Sr. 

We were assisted in securing aircraft and ice-based logistic 
support from the Office of Aircraft Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, and the Naval Arctic 
Research Laboratory, University of Alaska, Barrow, Alaska. 

Special appreciation is extended to Francis Fay, Institute 
of Marine Sciences, University of Alaska, Fairbanks; John 
Burns, Kathy Frost, and Lloyd Lowry, Alaska Department 
of Fish and Game, Fairbanks; Carl Grauvogel, Alaska De- 
partment of Fish and Game, Nome; Donald Ljungblad, 
Naval Oceans Systems Center, San Diego, Calif.; and Mark 
Fraker, LGL Ltd., Sidney, British Columbia, Canada, for 
their advice and help during various aspects of our research. 

This study was partially funded by the Bureau of Land 
Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, under an in- 
teragency agreement with the National Oceanic and Atmo- 
spheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, as 
part of a multiyear program managed by the Alaska Outer 
Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program 
(OCSEAP) office in Juneau, Alaska. We particularly appre- 
ciated the help and patience extended to us by Rodney 
Swope, Donald Day, and George Lapine of that office. 


LITERATURE CITED 


ALASKA DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME. 
1957. Beluga investigation. Alaska Dep. Fish. Annu. Rep. 9:57-58. 
ALASKA DEPARTMENT of FISHERIES. 


1955. Beluga investigation. Alaska Dep. Fish. Annu. Rep. 7:98-106. 

1956. Study plan II. Beluga. Alaska Dep. Fish. Annu. Rep. 8:54-56. 
ALLEN, A. J. 

1978. A whaler and trader in the Arctic, 1895-1944. Northwest Publ. 


Co., Anchorage, Alaska, 213 p. 
ANDERSON, R. M. 
1946. Catalogue of Canadian recent mammals. Can. Dep. Mines Re- 
sour., Mines and Geol. Branch, Natl. Mus. Can., Bull. 102, Biol. Ser. 
31, 238 p. 


32 


ARSENYEY, V. A. 

1939. Raspredelenie i migratsii belukhi na Dal’nem Vostoke (Distribu- 
tion and migration of the white whale in Far East). [In Russ., Engl. 
abstr.] Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. 
15, 108 p. 

BAILEY, A. M., and R. W. HENDEE. 

1926. Notes on the mammals of northwestern Alaska. 
7:9-28. 

BELKOVICH, V. M. 

1960. Nekotorye biologicheskye nab, udeniya za belukhoy s samoleta 
(Some biological observations on white dolphin from the airplane). [In 
Russ., Engl. summ.] Zool. Zh. 39:1414-1422. (Transl. by U.S. Naval 
Oceanogr. Off., Transl. 403, Washington, D.C., 1968, 14 p.) 

BERZIN, A. A., and N. V. DOROSHENKO. 

1981. Right whales of the Okhotsk Sea. 
31:451-455. 

BOCKSTOCE, J. R. 

1977. Steam whaling in the western Arctic. 
New Bedford, Mass., 127 p. 

BODFISH, H. H. 

1936. Chasing the bowhead. 
281 p. 

BRAHAM, H. W., F.E. DURHAM, G. H. JARRELL, andS. LEATHERWOOD. 

1980a. Ingutuk: A morphological variant of the bowhead whale, Ba/aena 
mysticetus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):70-73. 

BRAHAM, H. W., M. A. FRAKER, and B. D. KROGMAN. 

1980b. Spring migration of the western Arctic population of bowhead 
whales. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):36-46. 

BRAHAM, H., B. KROGMAN, J. JOHNSON, W. MARQUETTE, D. RUGH, 
M. NERINI, R. SONNTAG, T. BRAY, J. BRUEGGEMAN, M. DAHL- 
HEIM, S. SAVAGE, and C. GOEBEL. 

1980c. Population studies of the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus): 
Preliminary results of the 1979 spring research season. Rep. Int. 
Whaling Comm. 30:391-404. 

BRAHAM, H., B. KROGMAN, S. LEATHERWOOD, W. MARQUETTE, 
D. RUGH, M. TILLMAN, J. JOHNSON, and G. CARROLL. 

1979. Preliminary report of the 1978 spring bowhead whale research pro- 
gram results. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 29:291-306. 

BRAHAM, H., B. KROGMAN, M. NERINI, D. RUGH, W. MARQUETTE, 
and J. JOHNSON. 

1980d. Research on bowhead whales, June-December 1978. 
Whaling Comm. 30:405-413. 

BRAHAM, H. W., W. M. MARQUETTE, T. W. 
LEATHERWOOD (editors). 

1980e. The bowhead whale: Whaling and biological research. 
Fish. Rev. 42(9-10), 96 p. 

BREIWICK, J. M., E. D. MITCHELL, and D. G. CHAPMAN. 


J. Mammal. 


Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 
Old Dartmouth Hist. Soc., 


Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 


Rep. Int. 
BRAY, and J. S. 


Mar. 


1980. Estimated initial population size of the Bering Sea stock of bow- 
head whale, Balaena mysticetus: An iterative model. Fish. Bull., U.S. 
78:843-853. 

BRODIE, P. F. 

1969. Mandibular layering in Delphinapterus leucas and age determina- 
tion. Nature (Lond.) 221:956-958. 

1971. A reconsideration of aspects of growth, reproduction, and be- 


havior of the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas), with reference to the 
Cumberland Sound, Baffin Island, populaton. J. Fish. Res. Board 
Can. 28:1309-1318. 
BROOKS, J. W. 
1963. The management and status of marine mammals in Alaska. 
North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 28:314-325. 
BROWER, C. D. 
1942. Fifty years below zero. 
BRUEGGEMAN, J. J. 
1980. Coastal occurrence of birds at Point Barrow, Alaska, in spring. 
Murrelet 61:31-34. 


Trans. 


Dodd, Mead and Co., N.Y., 310 p. 


1982. Early spring distribution of bowhead whales in the Bering Sea. J. 
Wildl. Manage. 46:1036-1044. 
BURGESS, S. 
1973. Marine mammal phenology in western St. Lawrence Island waters. 


{Abstr.] Proc. Alaska Sci. Conf. 23:49. 
CARROLL, G. M., and J. R. SMITHHISLER. 
1980. Observations of bowhead whales during spring migration. 
Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):80-85. 
CLARK, A. H. 
1943. Iceland and Greenland. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 
D.C., War Background Studies 15, 103 p. 


Mar. 


COOK, J. A. 

1926. Pursuing the whale. A quarter century of whaling in the Arctic. 

Houghton Mifflin Co., N.Y., 344 p. 
CUBBAGE, J. C., and D. J. RUGH. 

1982. Bowhead whale length estimates and calf counts in the eastern 

Beaufort Sea, 1980. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 32:371-373. 
DAHLHEIM, M., T. BRAY, and H. BRAHAM. 

1980. Vessel survey for bowhead whales in the Bering and Chukchi Seas, 

June-July 1978. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):51-57. 
DAVIS, R. A., and W. R. KOSKI. 

1980. Recent observations of the bowhead whale in the eastern Canadian 

High Arctic. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 30:439-444. 
DEGERBOEL, M., and P. FREUCHEN. 

1935. Report on the fifth Thule expedition, 1921-24, the Danish expedi- 
tion to arctic North America in charge of Knud Rasmussen, Vol. 2, No. 
45. Glydendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag, Copenhagen, 278 p. 

DOAN, K. H., and C. W. DOUGLAS. 

1953. Beluga of the Churchill region of Hudson Bay. 
Can., Bull. 98, 27 p. 

DOROFEEYV, S. V., and S. K. KLUMOV. 

1936. K. Voprasu ob opredelenii vozrasta belukhi i sostava kosyakov 
(On age determination of the white whale and the composition of the 
herds). Morskie Mlekopitayuschie Dal’nevo Vostoka (Marine Mammals 
of the Soviet Far East). Tr. Vses. Nauchno-issled. Inst. Morsk. Rybn. 
Khoz. Okeanogr. 3:24-32. (Summarized in English by G. Mares, Fish. 
Res. Board Can., Transl. Ser. 69, 4 p.) 

DURHAM, F. E. 

1979. The catch of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) by Eskimos, 
with emphasis on the western Arctic. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Ang. Cty. 
Contrib. Sci. 314, 14 p. 

1980. External morphology of bowhead fetuses and calves. 
Rev. 42(9-10):74-80. 

EBERHARDT, L. L., and J. M. BREIWICK. 

1980. Minimal historical size of the western Arctic population of bow- 

head whales. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):27-29. 
ESCHRICHT, D., and J. REINHARDT. 

1866. On the Greenland right-whale (Balaena mysticetus, Linn.). Transl. 
from Danish. Jn W. H. Flower (editor), Recent memoirs on the Cetacea, 
p. 1-150. Robert Hardwicke, Lond. 

EVERITT, R. D., and B. D. KROGMAN. 

1979. Sexual behavior of bowhead whales observed off the north coast 

of Alaska. Arctic 32:277-280. 
FAY, F. H. 

1974. The role of ice in the ecology of marine mammals of the Bering 
Sea. In D. W. Hood and E. J. Kelley (editors), Oceanography of the 
Bering Sea with emphasis on renewable resources, p. 383-399. Univ. 
Alaska, Inst. Mar. Sci., Fairbanks. 

FEDOSEEV, G. A. 

1966. Aerovizual’nye nablyndeniya za morskim: mlekopitayushchimi v 
Beringovom i Chikotskom moryakh (Airplane survey of marine mam- 
mals in the Bering and Chukchi Seas). Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno- 
issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. 58:173-177. (Transl. by U.S. Dep. 
Inter., Bur. Commer. Fish., Seattle, Wash., 1966, p. 98-102 in K. I. 
Panin (editor), Soviet research on marine mammals of the Far East.) 

FOWLER, C. W., and T. SMITH. 

1973. Characterizing stable populations: An application to the African 

elephant population. J. Wildl. Manage. 37:513-523. 
FRAKER, M. A., and J. R. BOCKSTOCE. 

1980. Summer distribution of bowhead whales in the eastern Beaufort 

Sea. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):57-64. 
FRAKER, M. A., D. E. SERGEANT, and W. HOEK. 

1978. Bowhead and white whales in the southern Beaufort Sea. Dep. 
Fish Environ., Beaufort Sea Proj., Sidney, B.C. Beaufort Sea Tech. 
Rep. 4, 114 p. 

GILMORE, R. M. 


Fish. Res. Board 


Mar. Fish. 


1951. The Arctic right whale, Greenland whale, or bowhead. Encyclo- 
pedia Arctica, Vol. 15: Misc., 71 p. 
GOODMAN, S. 
1978. Management implications of the mathematical demography of 


long-lived animals. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Tech. 
Springfield, Va., 80 p. (NTIS No. PB-289 678.) 
GRAY, R. W. 
1886. Balaena mysticetus - the Greenland, Arctic, or bowhead whale. 
Naturalist (Lond.) 781:193-199. 
HADLEY, J. 
1915. Whaling off the Alaskan coast. 


Inf. Serv., 


Bull. Am. Geogr. Soc. 47:905-921. 


33 


HANNA, G. D. 
1920. Mammals of the St. Matthew Islands, Bering Sea. 
1:118-122. 
HARRISON, C. S., and J. D. HALL. 
1978. Alaskan distribution of the beluga whale, Delphinapterus leucas. 
Can. Field-Nat. 92:235-241. 
INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION. 
1978. Protection stocks, review of status. Report of the Scientific Com- 
mittee. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 28:66-67. 


J. Mammal. 


JOHNSON, J. H., H. W. BRAHAM, B. D. KROGMAN, W. M. MAR- 
QUETTE, R. M. SONNTAG, and D. J. RUGH. 
1981. Bowhead whale research: June 1979 to June 1980. Rep. Int. 
Whaling Comm. 31:461-475. 
JOHNSON, M. L., C. H. FISCUS, B. T. OSTENSON, and M. L. BARBOUR. 
1966. Marine mammals. Jn N. J. Wilimovsky and J. N. Wolfe (editors), 
Environment of the Cape Thompson region, Alaska, p. 877-924. U.S. 
Atomic Energy Comm., Oak Ridge, Tenn. (Avail. U.S. Dep. Commer., 
Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, Va.) 
JONSGARD, A. 
1981. Bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, observed in Arctic waters of 
the eastern North Atlantic after the Second World War. Rep. Int. 
Whaling Comm. 31:511. 


KLEINENBERG, S. E., A. V. YABLOKOV, V. M. BEL’KOVICH, and M.N. 
TARASEVICH. 

1964. Balukha. Opyt monograficheskogo issledovaniya vida (Beluga 
(Delphinapterus leucas) investigation of the species). Izd. ‘‘Nauka’’ 
Moscow, 454 p. (Transl. by Israel Program Sci. Transl., 1969, 376 p., 
avail. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, Va.) 

KLINKHART, E. G. 

1966. The beluga whale in Alaska. Alaska Dep. Fish Game, Fed. Aid 

Wildl. Restor. Proj. Rep., Vol. 7, 11 p. 
KLUMOV, S. K. 

1939, Belukha sovetskovo severa (Syr’evaya baza: prouysel). (The white 
whale of the Soviet north (stocks and fisheries).) Izd. Pishchepromiz- 
dat, Moscow-Leningard, 77 p. 

KROGMAN, B. 

1977. Six bowhead whales in the arctic. Alaska 43(9):52-53. 

1980. Sampling strategy for enumerating the western Arctic population 
of the bowhead whale. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):30-36. 

LAWS, R. M. 

1959. The foetal growth rates of whales with special reference to the fin 

whale, Balaenoptera physalus Linn. Discovery Rep. 29:281-308. 
LJUNGBLAD, D. K. 


1981. Aerial surveys of endangered whales in the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi 
Sea and northern Bering Sea. Nav. Ocean Syst. Cent. Tech. Rep. 449, 
292 p. 


LOWRY, L. F., and J. J. BURNS. 
1980. Foods utilized by bowhead whales near Barter Island, Alaska, 
autumn 1979. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):88-91. 
LOWRY, L. F., K. J. FROST, and J. J. BURNS. 


1978. Food of ringed seals and bowhead whales near Point Barrow, 
Alaska. Can. Field-Nat. 92:67-70. 
LUBBOCK, B. 
1937. The arctic whalers. Brown, Son and Ferguson Ltd., Glasgow, 


Scotland, 483 p. 


MAHER, W. J., and N. J. WILIMOVSKY. 

1963. Annual catch of bowhead whales by Eskimos at Point Barrow, 

Alaska, 1928-1960. J. Mammal. 44:16-20. 
MANNING, T. H., and A. H. MacPHERSON. 

1958. The mammals of Banks Island. Arctic Inst. North Am., Tech. 

Pap. 2, 74 p. 
MANSFIELD, A. W. 

1971. Occurrence of the bowhead or Greenland right whale (Balaena 
mysticetus) in Canadian arctic waters. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 
1873-1875. 

MARKO, J. 

1975. Satellite observation of the Beaufort Sea ice cones. 

Victoria, B.C., Tech. Rep. 34, 137 p. 
MARQUETTE, W. M. 

1976. Bowhead whale field studies in Alaska, 1975. 
38(8):9-17. 

MARQUETTE, W. M., and J. R. BOCKSTOCE. 

1980. Historical shore-based catch of bowhead whales in the Bering, 
Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. Mar. Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):5-19. 


Dep. Environ., 


Mar. Fish. Rev. 


MARQUETTE, W. M., H. W. BRAHAM, M. K. NERINI, and R. V. MILLER. 


1982. Bowhead whale studies, autumn 1980-spring 1981: Harvest, biology 
and distribution. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. 32:357-370. 
McVAY, S. 
1973. Stalking the Arctic whale. Am. Sci. 61:24-37. 


MITCHELL, E. 

1975. Trophic relationships and competition for food in northwest Atlan- 
tic whales. Jn M. D. B. Burt (editor), Proceedings of the Canadian So- 
ciety of Zoologists Annual Meeting, June 2-5, 1974, Fredericton, New 
Brunswick, p. 123-133. 

NEMOTO, T. 

1976. Feeding pattern of baleen whales in the ocean. Jn J. S. Cobb and 
M. M. Harlin (editors), Marine ecology: selected readings, p. 130-141. 
Univ. Park Press, Baltimore, Md. 

NISHIWAKI, M. 

1967. Distribution and migration of marine mammals in the North Pacific 
area. Bull. Univ. Tokyo, Ocean Res. Hist. 1:1-64. x 

1972. Delphinapterus leucas. In S. H. Ridgway (editor), Mammals of the 
sea, biology and medicine, p. 65-66. Charles C. Thomas, Publ., 
Springfield, Ill. 

NISHIWAKI, M., and T. KASUYA. 

1970. A Greenland right whale caught at Osaka Bay. 

Res. Inst. 22:45-62. 
PORSILD, A. E. 

1950. A biological exploration of Banks and Victoria Islands. 

3:45-54. 
REEVES, R. R. 

1980. Spitsbergen bowhead stock: A short review. 

42(9-10):65-69. 
RICE, D. W. 

1977. A list of the marine mammals of the world. 3d ed. 

Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-711, 15 p. 
RICE, D. W., and A. A. WOLMAN. 


Sci. Rep. Whales 
Arctic 
Mar. 


Fish. Rev. 


U.S. Dep. 


1971. Life history and ecology of the gray whale (Eschrichtuus robustus). 
Am. Soc. Mammal. Spec. Publ. No. 3, 142 p. 
ROSS, W. G. 
1974. Distribution, migration, and depletion of bowhead whales in Hud- 


son Bay, 1860 to 1915. Arct. Alp. Res. 6:85-98. 
RUGH, D. J., and J. C. CUBBAGE. 

1980. Migration of bowhead whales past Cape Lisburne, Alaska. 

Fish. Rev. 42(9-10):46-5S1. 
SCAMMON, C. M. 

1874. The marine mammals of the north-western coast of North Amer- 
ica, described and illustrated: together with an account of the American 
whale-fishery. John H. Carmany & Co., San Franc., and G. P. Put- 
nam’s Sons, N.Y., 319 p. 

SGHEEFERs.V-:B: 

1972. Marine mammals in the Gulf of Alaska. Jn D. H. Rosenberg 
(editor), A review of the oceanography and renewable resources of the 
northern Gulf of Alaska, p. 175-207. Univ. Alaska, Inst. Mar. Sci., 
Fairbanks. 

SCHEFFER, V. B., and J. W. SLIPP. 

1948. The whales and dolphins of Washington State with a key to the 
cetaceans of the west coast of North America. Am. Midl. Nat. 39: 
257-337. 


Mar. 


34 


SCORESDY, W., Jr. = 
1820. An account of the Arctic regions, with a history and description of 
the northern whale-fishery, Vol. 1, 551 p. Archibald Constable and 
Co., Edinburgh, Scotland. 
SERGEANT, D. E. 


1962. The biology and hunting of beluga or white whales in the Cana- 
dian Arctic. Fish. Res. Board Can., Circ. 8, 15 p. 

1968. Whales. /n C. S. Beals (editor), Science, history and Hudson Bay, 
Vol. I, p. 388-396. Queens Printer, Ottawa, Ontario. 

1973. Biology of white whales (De/phinapterus leucas) in western Hud- 
son Bay. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30:1065-1090. 


SERGEANT, D. E., and W. HOEK. 

1974. Seasonal distribution of bowhead and white whales in the eastern 
Beaufort Sea. Jn J. C. Reed and J. E. Sater (editors), The coast and 
shelf of the Beaufort Sea, p. 705-719. Arctic Inst. North Am., Arling- 
ton, Va. 

SHAPIRO, L. H., and J. J. BURNS. 

1975. Satellite observations of sea ice movement in the Bering Strait 
region. Jn G. Weller and S. A. Bowling (editors), Climate of the Arctic, 
p. 379-386. Univ. Alaska, Geophys. Inst., Fairbanks. 

SLEPTSOV, M. M. 

1961. O kolebanii chislennost; kitoy vy Chukotskom more v raznyve gody 
(Fluctuation in the number of whales of the Chukchi Sea in various 
years). Tr. Inst. Morfol. Zhivotnykh 34:54-64. (Transl. by U.S. Nav. 
Oceanogr. Off., Washington, D.C., 1970, Transl. 478, 18 p.) 

SEUIUPERSEsJ: 

1962. Whales. 


SOUTHWELL, T. 
1898. The migration of the right whale (Ba/aena mysticetus), Part I-In 
the Greenland waters. Nat. Sci. 12(76):397-414. 
STEFANSSON, V. 
1943. The friendly arctic. 2d ed. 
STIRLING, I. 
1980. The biological importance of polynyas in the Canadian Arctic. 
Arctic 33:303-315. 
TOMILIN, A. 
1957. Zveri SSSR i prilezhashchikh stran (Mammals of the USSR and 
adjacent countries). Vol. 9, Kitoobraznye (Cetaceans). Izd. Akad. 
Nauk SSSR, Moskva, 756 p. (Transl. by Israel Program Sci. Transl., 
1967, 717 p., avail. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Spring- 
field, Va., as TT65-5S0086.) 
TOWNSEND, C. H. 
1935. The distribution of certain whales as shown by logbook records of 
American whaleships. Zoologica (N.Y.) 19(1):3-50. 
VIBE;.G: 
1967. Arctic animals in relation to climatic fluctuations. 
170(5), 227 p. 


VLADYKOV, V. D. 

1944. Etudes sur les mamiferes aquatiques III: Chasse, biologie et valeur 
economique du marsouin blanc ou beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) du 
fleuve et du golfe St. Laurent. Dep. Pecheries, Quebec, 194 p. 

1946. Nourriture du marsouin blanc ou beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) 
du fleuve Saint-Laurent. Dep. Pecheries, Quebec, Contrib. 17, 123 p. 


Hutchinson & Co., Lond., 475 p. 


Macmillian Co., N.Y., 812 p. 


Medd. Gronl. 


APPENDIX I 


Aerial surveys flown during 1975-77 as part of OCSEAP Research Unit 
69. File identifiers are those used on both Environmental Data Service 
OCSEAP 027 format and National Marine Mammal Laboratory format. Mileage 
(approximate) is in kilometers. Wnt-Wainwright; RE-return. 


File Survey Description 
identifier date (survey origin/area surveyed) 


1. Sep 6-Sep 29,'75 Total miles surveyed: 10,945. Total hours flown: 47:10. 


175249 6 Sep Barrow, Wnt., RE / C. Simpson / coast 
175252 9 Sep Barrow, RE / C. Simpson / coast 

175255 12 Sep Barrow, Deadhorse, RE / coast 

175257 14 Sep Barrow, Barter I., Deadhorse, RE / coast 
175258 15 Sep Barrow, Prudoe Bay, Lonely / coast 
175259 16 Sep Lonely, Barrow / coast 

175263 20 Sep Barrow, Barter I., RE / coast 

175266 23 Sep Barrow, Pt. Lay., Icy Cape, RE / coast 
175267 24 Sep Barrow, RE / C. Simpson 

175269 26 Sep Barrow, Pt. Lay, RE / coast 

175270 27 Sep Barrow, RE / coast 

175272 29 Sep Barrow, Barter I., Barter I., RE / Herschel I. 


2. Oct 9-Oct 14,'75 Total miles surveyed: 4,695. Total hours flown: 18:25. 


175282 9 Oct Nome, RE / S. Chukchi Sea 

175285 12 Oct Nome, RE / N. Bering Sea, St. Lawrence I. 

175287 14 Oct Nome, Anch. / St. Lawrence I., St. Matthew I., 
Nunivak I. 


3. Mar 15-Mar 21,'76 Total miles surveyed: 4,380. Total hours flown: 19:52. 


176075 15 Mar Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I., Gulf of Anadyr 

176078 17 Mar Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I., Bering St. 

176079 19 Mar Nome, RE / N. St. Lawrence I., SW. St. 
Lawrence I. 

176081 21 Mar Nome, RE / N. St. Lawrence I. 


4. Apr 6-Apr 23,'76 Approx. total miles surveyed: 17,140. Total hours flown: 


176097 6 Apr King S., RE / Bristol Bay, ice front, Cold Bay 

176099 8 Apr King S., RE / Central Bristol Bay 

176100 9 Apr King S., RE / Bristol Bay 

176103 12 Apr King S., RE / Central Bristol Bay 

176104 13 Apr King S., Nome/Bristol Bay, St. Lawrence I. 

176106 15 Apr Nome, King S. / St. Lawrence I., St. Matthew I. 
Bristol Bay 

176108 17 Apr King S., RE / Central Bristol Bay 

176109 18 Apr King S., RE / Central Bristol Bay 

176110 19 Apr King S., Bethel, Nome / Bristol Bay, St. 


Lawrence I. 


35 


HERO 


File 
identifier 


176111 
176112 
176113 
176114 


Survey 
date 


20 
21 
22 
23 


Apr 
Apr 
Apr 
Apr 


5. Apr 30-May 14,'76 Total 


17612] 
176122 
176124 
176129 
176130 
176133 
176135 


30 
] 
3 
8 
9 

12 

14 


Apr 
May 
May 
May 
May 
May 
May 


6. May 15-May 31,'76 Total 


176136 
176140 
176141 
176143 
176145 
176149 
176152 


15 
19 
20 
22 
24 
28 
3] 


7. Jun I-Jdun 5,'76 


176153 
176156 
176157 


8. Jun 8-Jun 14,'76 


176160 
17616] 
176162 
176163 
176164 
176165 
176166 


] 
4 
5 


May 
May 
May 
May 
May 
May 
May 


Total 


Jun 
Jun 
Jun 


Total 


Jun 
Jun 
dun 
Jun 
Jun 
Jun 
Jun 


9. Jun 18-Jun 20,'76 Total 


176170 
176171 
276172 


18 
19 
20 


Jun 
Jun 
Jun 


Description 
(survey origin / area surveyed) 


Nome, RE / St. Lawrence Island, Bering St. 
Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I., Bering St., Pt.Hope 
Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I. 

Nome, Anch / Norton Sound 


miles surveyed: 4,600. Total hours flown: 25:17. 


Barrow, RE / coast, Pt. Hope 

Barrow, RE / Wainwright, offshore 

Barrow, RE / Icy Cape 

Barrow, RE / Shorelead 

Barrow, RE / N.E. offshore 

Barrow, Barter I., Deadhorse, RE / Leads, fast 
Barrow, RE / N.E. offshore 


miles surveyed: 2,605. Total hours flown: 14:43. 


Barrow, RE / Shorelead W. 

Barrow, Pt. Hope, RE / coast 

Barrow, RE / N.E. lead system 

Barrow, RE / lead W., N.E. pack ice 
Barrow, RE / shorelead W. 

Barrow, Peard Bay, RE/shorelead, fast ice 
Barrow, RE / shorelead W. 


miles surveyed: 1,575. Total hours flown: 7:21. 


Barrow, Pt. Hope, RE / coast 
Barrow, RE / C. Simpson and N.E. 
Barrow, RE / coast W. 


miles surveyed: 8,025. Total hours flown: 34:30. 


Anch., Nome/Norton Sd. 

Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I., Bering St. 

Nome, RE / N. Bering Sea, S. Chukchi Sea 
Nome, Kotz. / N. Bering Sea, S. Chukchi Sea 
Kotz., Nome / Bering St., N. St. Lawrence I. 
Nome, RE / Norton Sd., St. Lawrence I. 

Nome, King S. / Bering St., E. Bering Sea 


miles surveyed: 2,930. Total hours flown: 15:26. 
Barrow, RE / offshore 
Barrow, RE / nearshore leads 


Barrow, Barter I. Prudoe Bay, RE / offshore, 
fast ice 


36 


File 


identifier 


Survey 
date 


Description 
(survey origin / area surveyed) 


10. Aug 17-Aug 26,'76 Total miles surveyed: 8,830. Total hours flown: 39:22. 


176230 
176231 
176232 
276233 
276234 
176235 
176236 
176237 
176238 
176239 


11. Sep 20-Sep 26,'76 Total 


176264 
176265 
176266 
176268 
176270 


12. March 31-Apr 3,'77 Total 


177090 
177091 
177092 
177093 


13. Apr 19-Apr 26,'77 Total 


177109 
177113 
177116 


14. May 11-May 14,'77 Total 


177131 
177132 
177134 


15. May 21-May 30,'77 Total 


17714] 
177150 


17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 


20 
21 
22 
24 
26 


31 
] 
2 
3 


19 
23 
26 


1] 
12 
14 


21 
30 


Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 
Aug 


Sep 
Sep 
Sep 
Sep 
Sep 


Mar 
Apr 
Apr 
Apr 


Apr 
Apr 
Apr 


May 
May 
May 


May 
May 


Deadhorse, RE / S. Beaufort Sea 
Deadhorse, RE / S. Beaufort Sea 
Deadhorse, Barrow / S. Beaufort Sea 
Barrow, RE / S. Chukchi Sea 

Barrow, Kotz. / S. Chukchi Sea 
Kotzen REE /mKotz Sd: 

Kotz. 2eRE Vaikotzs Sd. 

Kotz., Nome / Bering Sea 

Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I. 

Nome, Bethel / Norton Sd. 


miles surveyed: 2,183. Total hours flown: 9:49. 


Barrow, C. Lis., RE / coast, bird survey 
Barrow, RE / C. Simpson, N. pack ice 
Barrow, RE / C. Simpson, N.W. pack ice 
Barrow, RE / C. Simpson, N.E. pack ice 
Barrow, RE / C. Simpson 


miles surveyed: 4,540. Total hours flown: 18:18. 
Anch., Nome / S. Norton Sd. 
Nome, RE / Pt. Hope, Kotz. Sd. 
Nome, RE / St. Lawrence I. 
Nome, RE / N. Norton Sd., N. St. Lawrence I. 
miles surveyed: 325. Total hours flown: 1:17. 
Barrow, RE / Pt. Hope 
Barrow, Pt. Hope / coast, fast ice 
C. Lis., Barrow / coast 
miles surveyed: 3,875. Total hours flown: 12:14. 
Anch., Nome / N. Norton Sd. 
Nome, RE / Pt. Hope, Kotz. Sd. 
Nome, Bethel / Norton Sd., Nunivak I. 
miles surveyed: 1,317. Total hours flown: 5:45. 


Barrow, RE / Barter I. 
Barrow, RE / Northeast leads 


37 


File 


identifier 


Survey 
date 


Description 
(survey origin / area surveyed) 


16. Aug 26-Oct 13,'77 Total miles surveyed: 6,500. Total hours flown: 27:17. 


177238 
177241 
177244 
177248 
177251 
177253 
177257 
177276 
W279 
177286 


26 
29 


Aug 
Aug 
Sep 
Sep 
Sep 
Sep 
Sep 
Oct 
Oct 
Oct 


Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 
Barrow, 


C. Simpson, RE / coast, Oarlock Isl. 
RE / coastal to Lonely, Mid-Oarlock I. 
C. Simpson, RE / coast, Oarlock I. 

RE / N. to ice, E. to Lonely, coastal 
Barter Isl., RE / offshore E. to Bord 
RE / N.W. Chukchi Sea 

RE / N.W. Chukchi Sea 

RE / NN. to tce, Es, coastal 

RE / N.E. and coastal 

C. Simpson, RE / coast. 


38 


APPENDIX II 


Aerial survey tracklines flown September 1975-October 1977 


x 


Alaska 


Gulf of 
Alaska 


> «o 


174 SS ley 141 


39 


Meru pt | 
iver Ali) Hanan pibey ae 


ie # I a a # ign 4A 
}- a Weel 
= a 
| ; 
. iS ae 
rs 
‘ meee i 
oe E rs a 
ke nat 
te 
- | ) 
~ ‘ | 
os aps 
4 Rae 


ie 


ee ee 


i 


NOAA TECHNICAL REPORT NMFS 


Guidelines for Contributors 


CONTENTS OF MANUSCRIPT 


First page. Give the title (as concise as possible) of the paper 
and the author’s name, and footnote the author’s affiliation, 
mailing address, and ZIP code. 


Contents. Contains the text headings and abbreviated figure 
legends and table headings. Dots should follow each entry and 
page numbers should be omitted. 


Abstract. Not to exceed one double-spaced page. Footnotes 
and literature citations do not belong in the abstract. 


Text. See also Form of the Manuscript below. Follow the 
U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, 1973 edition. 
Fish names, follow the American Fisheries Society Special 
Publication No. 12, A List of Common and Scientific Names 
of Fishes from the United States and Canada, fourth edition, 
1980. Use short, brief, informative headings in place of 
“*Materials and Methods.”’ 


Text footnotes. Type ona separate sheet from the text. For 
unpublished or some processed material, give author, year, 
title of manuscript, number of pages, and where it is filed— 
agency and its location. 


Personal communications. Cite name in text and footnote. 
Cite in footnote: John J. Jones, Fishery Biologist, Scripps In- 
stitution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92037, pers. com- 
mun. 21 May 1977. 


Figures. Should be self-explanatory, not requiring reference 
to the text. All figures should be cited consecutively in the text 
and their placement, where first mentioned, indicated in the 
left-hand margin of the manuscript page. Photographs and 
line drawings should be of ‘‘professional’’ quality—clear and 
balanced, and can be reduced to 42 pices for page width or to 
20 picas for a single-column width, but no more than 57 picas 
high. Photographs and line drawings should be printed on 
glossy paper—sharply focused, good contrast. Label each 
figure. DO NOT SEND original figures to the Scientific Edi- 
tor; NMFS Scientific Publications Office will request these if 
they are needed. 


Tables. Each table should start on a separate page and 
should be self-explanatory, not requiring reference to the text. 
Headings should be short but amply descriptive. Use only 
horizontal rules. Number table footnotes consecutively across 
the page from left to right in Arabic numerals; and to avoid 
confusion with powers, place them to the /eft of the numerals. 
If the original tables are typed in our format and are clean and 
legible, these tables will be reproduced as they are. In the text 
all tables should be cited consecutively and their placement, 
where first mentioned, indicated in the left-hand margin of the 
manuscript page. 


Acknowledgments. Place at the end of text. Give credit only 
to those who gave exceptional contributions and nof to those 
whose contributions are part of their normal duties. 


Literature cited. In text as: Smith and Jones (1977) or (Smith 
and Jones 1977); if more than one author, list according to 
years (e.g., Smith 1936; Jones et al 1975; Doe 1977). All pa- 
pers referred to in the text should be listed alphabetically by 
the senior author’s surname under the heading ‘‘Literature 
Cited’’; only the author’s surname and initials are required in 
the author line. The author is responsible for the accuracy of 
the literature citations. Abbreviations of names of periodicals 
and serials should conform to Biological Abstracts List of Ser- 
ials with Title Abbreviations. Format, see recent SSRF or Cir- 
cular. 


Abbreviations and symbols. Common ones, suchas mm, m, 
g, ml, mg, °C (for Celsius), %, °/oo, etc., should be used. Ab- 
breviate units of measures only when used with numerals; 
periods are rarely used in these abbreviations. But periods are 
used in et al., vs., e.g., i.e., Wash. (WA is used only with ZIP 
code), etc. Abbreviations are acceptable in tables and figures 
where there is lack of space. 


Measurements. Should be given in metric units. Other equi- 
valent units may be given in parentheses. 


FORM OF THE MANUSCRIPT 


Original of the manuscript should be typed double-spaced on 
white bond paper. Triple space above headings. Send good du- 
plicated copies of manuscript rather than carbon copies. The 
sequence of the material should be: 


FIRST PAGE 

CONTENTS 

ABSTRACT 

TEXT 

LITERATURE CITED 

TEXT FOOTNOTES 

APPENDIX 

TABLES (provide headings; including ‘‘Table’’ and Arabic 
numeral, e.g., Table 1.—, Table 2.—, etc.) 

LIST OF FIGURE LEGENDS (entire legend, including 
‘Figure’ and Arabic numberal, e.g., Figure 1.—, Figure 
2.—, etc.) 

FIGURES 


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 


Send ribbon copy and two duplicated copies of the manuscript 
to: 


Dr. William J. Richards, Scientific Editor 
Southeast Fisheries Center Miami Laboratory 
National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 
75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL 33149 


Copies. Fifty copies will be supplied to the senior author and 
100 to his organization free of charge. 


UNITED STATES 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 


NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION 
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE 
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS OFFICE 
7600 SAND POINT WAY N.E 
BIN C15700 
SEATTLE, WA 98115 


POSTAGF 40 Ser m+: 


= 


wi 


Ih 


088 


OFFICIAL BUSINESS. = 
Sel. LIBRARIES - EXCHANGE S 
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION 
WASHINGTON, DC 20560 


NOAA SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 


The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was established as part of the Department of Com- 
merce on October 3, 1970. The mission responsibilities of NOAA are to assess the socioeconomic impact of 
natural and technological changes in the environment and to monitor and predict the state of the solid arth, the 
oceans and their living resources, the atmosphere, and the space environment of the Earth. a 


The major components of NOAA regularly produce various types of scientific and technical information in 
the following kinds of publications: 


PROFESSIONAL PAPERS—Important definitive TECHNICAL SERVICE PUBLICATIONS—Re- 


research results, major techniques, and special investi- 
gations. 


CONTRACT AND GRANT REPORTS—Reports 
prepared by contractors or grantees under NOAA 
sponsorship. 


ATLAS—Presentation of analyzed data generally in 
the form of maps showing distribution of rainfall, 
chemical and physical conditions of oceans and atmo- 
sphere, distribution of fishes and marine mammals, 
ionospheric conditions, etc. 


ports containing data, observations, instructions, etc. 
A partial listing includes data serials; prediction and 
outlook periodicals; technical manuals, training pa- 
pers, planning reports, and information serials; and 
miscellaneous technical publications. 


TECHNICAL REPORTS—Journal quality with ex- 
tensive details, mathematical developments, or data 
listings. 


TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMS—Reports of pre- 
liminary, partial, or negative research or technology 
results, interim instructions, and the like. 


ATMO. 
A pxo SAiyg a 


Information on availability of NOAA publications can be obtained from: 


PUBLICATIONS SERVICES BRANCH (E/AI 13) 
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA, AND INFORMATION SERVICE 
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION 


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 


3300 Whitehaven St. 
Washington, DC 20235